Joyner v. Garrett

Citation279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241
Case DateAugust 30, 1971
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina

Page 241

183 S.E.2d 241
279 N.C. 397
Donald Gray JOYNER
v.
Joe W. GARRETT, Commissioner of Motor Vehicles of N.C.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Aug. 30, 1971.

Vaughan S. Winborne, for plaintiff.

Robert Morgan, Atty. Gen., William W. Melvin and T. Buie Costen, Asst. Attys. Gen., for the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles.

Petition to rehear by Commissioner of Motor Vehicles filed on the 11 day of August 1971, 182 S.E.2d 553. Denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 practice notes
  • Steinkrause v. Tatum, No. COA08-1080.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • December 8, 2009
    ...of a positive intention to disobey." Joyner v. Garrett, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 279 N.C. 226, 233, 182 S.E.2d 553, 558, reh'g denied, 279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971) (quoting Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.). Indeed, a "willful refusal" occurs whenever a (1) is aware that he has a choi......
  • Seders v. Powell, No. 20
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • November 6, 1979
    ...of our motor vehicle law amounts to a willful refusal. See, e. g., Joyner v. Garrett, 279 N.C. 226, 182 S.E.2d 553, Reh. denied 279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971); Creech v. Alexander, 32 N.C.App. 139, 231 S.E.2d 36, Cert. denied 293 N.C. 589, 239 S.E.2d 263 (1977). We affirm the trial cou......
  • Miller v. Epling, No. 11–0353.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • June 21, 2012
    ...proceeding is civil.”); Joyner v. Garrett, 279 N.C. 226, 238, 182 S.E.2d 553, 562 (internal citation and quotation omitted), reh'g denied,279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971) (it is well established that the same motor vehicle operation may give rise to two separate and distinct proceedings.......
  • Powers v. Tatum, No. COA08-137.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • May 5, 2009
    ...to the other. Joyner v. Garrett, 279 N.C. 226, 238, 182 S.E.2d 553, 562 (internal citation and quotation omitted), reh'g denied, 279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971). Notwithstanding this precedent, our appellate courts have allowed the doctrine of collateral estoppel to be applied when the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
14 cases
  • Steinkrause v. Tatum, COA08-1080.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • December 8, 2009
    ...of a positive intention to disobey." Joyner v. Garrett, Comr. of Motor Vehicles, 279 N.C. 226, 233, 182 S.E.2d 553, 558, reh'g denied, 279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971) (quoting Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed.). Indeed, a "willful refusal" occurs whenever a (1) is aware that he has a choi......
  • Seders v. Powell, 20
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • November 6, 1979
    ...of our motor vehicle law amounts to a willful refusal. See, e. g., Joyner v. Garrett, 279 N.C. 226, 182 S.E.2d 553, Reh. denied 279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971); Creech v. Alexander, 32 N.C.App. 139, 231 S.E.2d 36, Cert. denied 293 N.C. 589, 239 S.E.2d 263 (1977). We affirm the trial cou......
  • Miller v. Epling, 11–0353.
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of West Virginia
    • June 21, 2012
    ...proceeding is civil.”); Joyner v. Garrett, 279 N.C. 226, 238, 182 S.E.2d 553, 562 (internal citation and quotation omitted), reh'g denied,279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971) (it is well established that the same motor vehicle operation may give rise to two separate and distinct proceedings.......
  • Powers v. Tatum, COA08-137.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US)
    • May 5, 2009
    ...to the other. Joyner v. Garrett, 279 N.C. 226, 238, 182 S.E.2d 553, 562 (internal citation and quotation omitted), reh'g denied, 279 N.C. 397, 183 S.E.2d 241 (1971). Notwithstanding this precedent, our appellate courts have allowed the doctrine of collateral estoppel to be applied when the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT