Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Agnello
Decision Date | 05 May 2009 |
Docket Number | 2008-02881. |
Parties | JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellant, v. CARMINE AGNELLO, et al., Defendants and VICTORIA GOTTI, Also Known as VICTORIA AGNELLO, Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, upon reargument, the order dated October 23, 2007 is vacated, and those branches of the plaintiff's motion which were for summary judgment on the complaint and for appointment of a referee to compute the amount due it, and to examine and report whether the mortgaged premises can be sold in one parcel, are granted.
The plaintiff established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by presenting a mortgage, the unpaid mortgage note, a forbearance agreement executed by both the plaintiff and the defendant Victoria Gotti, also known as Victoria Agnello (hereinafter Gotti), which required Gotti to repay the loan in full by February 1, 2006, and an affidavit attesting to Gotti's default (see Daniel Perla Assoc., LP v 101 Kent Assoc., Inc., 40 AD3d 677, 677-678 [2007]; Coppa v Fabozzi, 5 AD3d 718 [2004]; Chiarelli v Kotsifos, 5 AD3d 345, 346 [2004]; EMC Mtge. Corp. v Riverdale Assoc., 291 AD2d 370 [2002]). In opposition, Gotti failed to "assert any defenses which could properly raise a viable question of fact as to [the] default" (Federal Home Loan Mtge. Corp. v Karastathis, 237 AD2d 558, 559 [1997] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Daniel Perla Assoc., 40 AD3d at 678; Chiarelli v Kotsifos, 5 AD3d at 346; Green Point Sav. Bank v Spivey, 253 AD2d 410, 411 [1998]). Contrary to Gotti's contention, the plaintiff's mere acceptance of monthly payments made on the loan subsequent to February 1, 2006 did not operate to extend the forbearance agreement, which specifically provided that any remaining sums owed on the loan became due and payable on February...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
PennyMac, Corp. v. Darren DiPrima
...[2d Dept.2010] ; Washington Mut. Bank v. O'Connor, 63 A.D.3d 832, 880 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2d Dept.2009] ; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Agnello, 62 A.D.3d 662, 878 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2d Dept.2009] ; Aames Funding Corp. v. Houston, 44 A.D.3d 692, 843 N.Y.S.2d 660 [2d Dept.2007] ). Notably, affirmativ......
-
Bank of N.Y. v. Morga
...[2d Dept.2010] ; Washington Mut. Bank v. O'Connor, 63 A.D.3d 832, 880 N.Y.S.2d 696 [2d Dept.2009] ; J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, NA v. Agnello, 62 A.D.3d 662, 878 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2d Dept.2009] ; Aames Funding Corp. v. Houston, 44 A.D.3d 692, 843 N.Y.S.2d 660 [2d Dept.2007] ). Notably, affirmative ......
-
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Arthur
...; Swedbank, AB, N.Y. Branch v. Hale Ave. Borrower, LLC, 89 AD3d 922, 932 N.Y.S.2d 540 [2d Dept 2011] ; JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Agnello, N.A ., 62 AD3d 662, 878 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2d Dept 2009] ; Loancare, a Div. of FNF Servicing, Inc. v. Fox, 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 27, 2015 WL 162359, 2015 N.Y. S......
-
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Holler
...Swedbank, AB, N.Y. Branch v. Hale Ave. Borrower, LLC, 89 A.D.3d 922, 932 N.Y.S.2d 540 [2d Dept 2011] ; JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Agnello, N.A., 62 A.D.3d 662, 878 N.Y.S.2d 397 [2d Dept 2009] ; Loancare, a Div. of FNF Servicing, Inc. v. Fox, 2015 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 27, 2015 WL 162359, 2015 N.Y. ......