June v. State, 19692
Decision Date | 11 June 1957 |
Docket Number | No. 19692,19692 |
Parties | Dave JUNE v. The STATE. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Syllabus by the Court.
The evidence against the accused was entirely circumstantial, and was insufficient to exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of his guilt.
Rachel Walthour and Dave June were charged with the murder of Albert Walthour, the husband of Rachel Walthour. On the trial of Dave June the jury returned a verdict of guilty with a recommendation of mercy. His motion for new trial on the general grounds, as amended by the addition of one special ground, was denied, and the exception is to that judgment.
The State's witnesses, on direct and cross-examination, testified in substance as follows:
Jerome Keller testified: In October, 1953, he saw the defendant, Rachel Walthour, and the deceased, near the home of the witness. He heard the deceased calling for help and he went to the place they were. Rachel Walthour had the deceased down and was astride him, and the defendant was standing over the deceased and snapping a pistol at him. The witness told the defendant that he should not do that, and the defendant 'slung' the pistol on him. The witness hit the defendant and the defendant fell down and dropped the pistol. At that time the defendant said that he would kill the deceased, calling him a vile name. The defendant is married to a sister of the deceased.
Major Jackson testified: The defendant was at the home of the witness about a month before the deceased was killed. At that time the defendant pulled a pistol out and threatened the deceased and his son, Dave Walthour. The defendant stated to the deceased: 'Me and you done been in it twice * * * the next time I will get your gigler [sic] vein.' The defendant made other threatening statements to the deceased, accompanying them with vile oaths.
Carol Barnard testified: On the date of the homicide the witness and the defendant were working at the same mill. When they were paid that evening the defendant made the statement to her that 'he was going to get full of whisky at McKinley Pyott's and he was going to kill him a son-of-a-bitch that night.'
McKinley Pyott testified: He operates a confectionary. On the evening before the homicide occurred, the defendant, the deceased, Rachel Walthour, Moses Walthour (son of the deceased), and Moses Walthour's wife were at his place of business. The Walthours and the defendant did not engage in any conversation while at his place. After the Walthours left, the defendant left.
Rosa Lee Walthour, daughter-in-law of the deceased and Rachel Walthour, testified: * * *'
Frank Givens, the operator of a funeral home, testified that he examined the body of the deceased, and that the cause of death was loss of blood from a stab wound.
Moses Walthour testified:
A. L. Kelly, Coroner of Long County, testified: He went to the home of the deceased on the night of the homicide. He found the deceased lying about four feet from the front steps. His left jugular vein had been cut in two by a knife. The witness saw a bloody cap on the back porch. Rachel Walthour told him that: the deceased hit her on the side of the head, and she told him not to hit her again; he hit her again, and she cut him with a knife; nobody was with her when she cut him; she put the knife under the front of the house. The witness found the knife under the back of the house. There was blood in the yard, at the back of the house, then through the house, and a puddle of blood in the front room.
Paul Williamson, Chief of Police of Ludowici, testified: He examined the deceased on the night of the homicide. The cause of death appeared to be a stab wound in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Barnes v. State
...and it would be more likely that they would be quarreling than others between whom good feelings had always existed. In June v. State, 213 Ga. 311, 99 S.E.2d 70, evidence of an incident three years earlier where the defendant had threatened the deceased, was held admissible because of the r......
-
U.S. v. Peacock
...170 Ga. 810, 154 S.E. 229; Cornwell v. State, 179 Ga. 668, 177 S.E. 235; Redwine v. State, 207 Ga. 318, 61 S.E.2d 481; June v. State, 213 Ga. 311, 99 S.E.2d 70. The insufficiency of the government's evidence is not cured by Mary Nell Peacock's testimony that Harvey told her he was the only ......
-
Brown v. State
...on the same victim was held admissible in Shaw v. State, 60 Ga. 246 when the death was accomplished partly by beating. In June v. State, 213 Ga. 311, 99 S.E.2d 70, evidence of a prior assault 4 or 5 years previously was held admissible to show bad feeling and because the evidence was condit......
-
Jester v. State, 39040
...several years before the homicide. Barnes v. State, 157 Ga.App. 582(1), 277 S.E.2d 916 (1981), citing, inter alia, June v. State, 213 Ga. 311, 99 S.E.2d 70 (1957). This enumerated error is without 3. The appellant further contends that he was deprived of a fair trial and due process of law ......