Junkin v. Se. Energy Corp. (Ex parte Se. Energy Corp.), 1150033
Decision Date | 15 April 2016 |
Docket Number | 1150033,1150294. |
Citation | 203 So.3d 1207 |
Parties | Ex parte SOUTHEASTERN ENERGY CORP. (In re Clatus Junkin v. Southeastern Energy Corp. et al.). Ex parte Southeastern Energy Corp. (In re Clatus Junkin v. Southeastern Energy Corp. et al.). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Lawrence T. King and Jessica Brown Powers of King Simmons, P.C., Birmingham, for petitioner.
Submitted on mandamus petition only.
On October 14, 2015, Southeastern Energy Corp. petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus ordering the Fayette Circuit Court to vacate its order denying Southeastern Energy's motion for a change of venue for the underlying action and directing the Fayette Circuit Court to grant the motion and transfer the action to the Montgomery Circuit Court (case no. 1150033). On December 18, 2015, Southeastern Energy filed a second petition for a writ of mandamus asking this Court to direct the Fayette Circuit Court to vacate an order it entered on December 16, 2015, transferring the underlying action to the Lowndes Circuit Court and to direct the Fayette Circuit Court to enter an order transferring the action to the Montgomery Circuit Court (case no. 1150294). We dismiss Southeastern Energy's petition in case no. 1150033, and we deny its petition in case no. 1150294.
The materials before us indicate that Clatus Junkin, a resident of Fayette County, owns and operates Johnco Materials, Inc., a sand and gravel pit located in Lowndes County. At some point in time, Junkin purchased diesel fuel from Southeastern Energy and had it delivered to Johnco Materials. When Southeastern Energy did not receive payment for the fuel, Southeastern Energy sued Johnco Materials and Junkin, individually, in Lowndes County. With regard to Junkin, Southeastern Energy alleged that "Junkin was personally liable to Southeastern Energy for diesel fuel that was sold and delivered to Johnco Materials." At the request of the parties, the Lowndes Circuit Court entered a consent judgment against Johnco Materials and in favor of Southeastern Energy for an agreed-upon amount and dismissed Junkin from the action with prejudice.
On June 29, 2015, Junkin sued Southeastern Energy in the Fayette Circuit Court alleging malicious prosecution by Southeastern Energy in the Lowndes County case. On August 2, 2015, Southeastern Energy moved to dismiss the malicious-prosecution action or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to "Montgomery County, Alabama, or any other proper venue, pursuant to Rule 82(d), Ala. R. Civ. P., and governing law." In support of its request for a change of venue, Southeastern Energy attached an affidavit from Jack R. Pitts, the president of Southeastern Energy, who averred:
On September 23, 2015, the Fayette Circuit Court denied Southeastern Energy's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for a change of venue.
On October 14, 2015, Southeastern Energy petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Fayette Circuit Court to vacate its September 23, 2015, order and to direct the Fayette Circuit Court to enter an order dismissing the underlying action or, in the alternative, transferring the action to Montgomery Circuit Court (case no. 1150033). Southeastern Energy did not request a stay of the action in the trial court pending resolution of its request for mandamus relief. On November 23, 2015, this Court denied Southeastern Energy's request for mandamus relief with regard to the dismissal of the action but ordered answers and briefs to determine whether Southeastern Energy was entitled to mandamus relief with regard to its request for a change of venue.
On December 16, 2015, the Fayette Circuit Court ordered the case transferred to the Lowndes Circuit Court. On December 18, 2015, Southeastern Energy moved this Court to stay the underlying action until resolution of its earlier request for mandamus relief with regard to venue. It also petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Fayette Circuit Court to vacate its December 16, 2015, order transferring the action to the Lowndes Circuit Court (case no. 1150294). On January 14, 2016, this Court granted Southeastern Energy's motion to stay, ordered answers and briefs to address the request for mandamus relief in case no. 1150294, and consolidated case nos. 1150033 and 1150294 for purposes of writing one opinion.
Ex parte Pike Fabrication, Inc., 859 So.2d 1089, 1091 (Ala.2002).
Southeastern Energy contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion to transfer the case from Fayette County to Montgomery County. In its motion, Southeastern Energy asked the trial court to transfer the underlying action to "Montgomery County, Alabama, or any other proper venue, pursuant to Rule 82(d), Ala. R. Civ. P., and governing law."
Rule 82(d)(1), Ala. R. Civ. P., provides:
In Ex parte Pike Fabrication, this Court set forth the law with regard to proper venue:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte C.D.
... ... Southeastern Energy Corp. , 203 So.3d 1207, 1212 (Ala ... ...
-
McDaniel v. SouthFirst Bancshares, Inc. (Ex parte McDaniel)
...grants the relief that is sought in this Court in the mandamus petition, then the petition may be mooted. Ex parte Southeastern Energy Corp., 203 So.3d 1207, 1212 (Ala. 2016). Here, the materials before us reveal that no new evidence was presented to the trial court to support or oppose the......
-
Steinberg v. Daugherty (Ex parte Steinberg)
...grants the relief that is sought in this Court in the mandamus petition, then the petition may be mooted. Ex parte Southeastern Energy Corp., 203 So. 3d 1207, 1212 (Ala. 2016)." Ex parte McDaniel, 291 So. 3d 847, 851 n.2 (Ala. 2019)."A petition for a writ of mandamus is a proper method by w......
-
Kendrick v. City of Midfield
... ... to a judgment as a matter of law." Ex parte Rizk, 791 So.2d 911, 912 (Ala.2000) (citations ... ...