La Junta & Lamar Canal Co. v. Hess

Decision Date09 September 1895
Citation42 P. 50,6 Colo.App. 497
PartiesLA JUNTA & LAMAR CANAL CO. v. HESS. [1]
CourtColorado Court of Appeals

Appeal from district court, Prowers county.

Bill by John Hess against the La Junta & Lamar Canal Company to compel the performance of a certain contract. Plaintiff had decree, and defendant appeals. Reversed.

John Hess filed a bill, on behalf of himself and other purchasers of water from the La Junta & Lamar Canal Company and its predecessor, the Arkansas River, Land Reservoir & Canal Company, to compel the performance of a certain condition specified in his deed, and in all others which were issued by the canal company, providing generally for the transfer to the purchasers by the company of the title to and control of the canal, on the happening of certain events. Whether the agreement literally provided for the transfer of title is unimportant, but the agreement in this respect is set out in that portion of the deed which is contained in the statement. He averred the occurrence of the events on which the right to control arose, and otherwise stated his right of action. The deed, in so far as it is under consideration in this opinion, is as follows:

"Know all men by these presents, that the Arkansas River, Land Reservoir, and Canal Company (a corporation existing under the laws of the state of Colorado), of the first part, and John Hess, of the county of Bent and state of Colorado, of the second part, for and in consideration of the sum of fifteen hundred dollars paid by said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged by said first party and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements in this deed contained, to be performed and kept by both of said parties, and hereafter specifically mentioned, the said first party hereby grants, bargains, sells, and conveys to the said second party, his heirs and assigns, one and one-half water right; that is to say, the right to the use of water flowing through the canal of said first party, each water right representing one and forty-four one-hundredths (1.44) cubic feet of water flowing under a weir per second, subject, however, to the following reservations and conditions, to which said party of the second part expressly agrees: First. Said company to furnish the said water to the second party or assigns continuously during the irrigating season, except as hereinafter provided and at no other time, unless with consent of company thereto in writing. Second. Said water shall be used for irrigating and domestic purposes on the following described tract of land, to wit, one hundred and twenty acres in the southwest quarter of section 18, township 22 south, of range 46, within Bent county, Colorado. Third. Said company expressly reserves to itself the right to distribute the water from its said canal in accordance with such rights and priorities as are or may hereafter be established or decreed, and this deed is received by the party of the second part subject to such priorities. Fourth. The said second party, his heirs or assigns, shall not permit said water, or any portion thereof, to be furnished as aforesaid, to run to waste; but, as soon as a sufficient quantity shall have been used for the purposes herein allowed, the said second party, his heirs or assigns, shall, in such a manner as the first party may prescribe, notify the first party that the said water may be shut off, and shall also give the first party timely notice when the same shall be again needed for the purposes aforesaid; but in no case shall the amount of said water taken or received at any time by said second party, his heirs or assigns, exceed the quantity first herein referred to. Fifth. The said company shall deliver said water at such point or points along the line of said canal or ditch, or from any of its reservoirs, or either or all, as it may determine to be the most practicable, and the manner of withdrawing and regulating the supply of said water from said company's canal, ditch, or reservoir shall be prescribed by said company, and shall at all times be under its control, as determined and directed by the board of directors of said company. The head gates, flumes, weirs, or other arrangements through which the water hereby sold shall be drawn off from the said company's canal, ditch, or reservoirs shall be made and placed in position by said company, but at the cost of the said second party, who shall be liable also for the expense of keeping the same in good repair and condition, and the said company may collect and enforce the payment of all sums expended for said purposes in the same manner as prescribed for collecting and enforcing assessments. *** Tenth. It is further agreed that the irrigating season shall commence April 1st, and continue to November first, of each and every year, and that thereafter water shall be conveyed for domestic purposes whenever reasonably practicable, subject to the right of said first party to repair, enlarge, or extend said canal.

"It is hereby further stipulated and agreed that when said first party shall have sold, and shall have outstanding and in force, a number of water rights equal to the estimated capacity of the company's ditch to furnish water, and two-fifths of the contract price for the same shall have been paid, then the holder or holders of such contracts for water rights shall have a voice and vote in the management of the affairs of said company's canal, proportional to the interest which said second party's contract bears to the entire number of contracts outstanding; and when two-thirds of all such outstanding rights have been fully paid for, according to the terms of the several contracts entered into, then the title to said canal shall pass to the owners and holders of contract for such water rights at the time, on the plan following: Within sixty days thereafter, at such time as may be fixed by the board of directors of first party, said board of directors of said first party shall hold a meeting for the purpose, and thereat designate five persons, who are at that time owners of water rights under said ditch, to be the incorporators of a new company, to be incorporated under the laws of the state of Colorado, and which said five persons shall within thirty days thereafter subscribe to articles incorporating a stock company under a new name, and said five persons shall be the directors for the first year; and, immediately following the signing and filing of articles of incorporation, the directors thereof shall organize, make by-laws, procure a seal, and otherwise proceed as the law directs; and at said time they shall issue, of the capital stock of the new company, full paid, to the owners of said water rights, such a proportion of the whole of said stock as the water right each owner thereof has will bear to the whole amount of water rights sold as aforesaid, and second party hereby agrees to accept and receive the stock of said new company as aforesaid; and when said water rights shall have been fully paid as aforesaid, and when said five persons shall have been named as herein provided by first party, and said five persons notified in writing of that fact, and that said water rights have been fully paid, as aforesaid, then the obligations of this company, said first party, in respect to said ditch, and the keeping the same in repair, or supplying water through the same, or any other ditch, canal, or reservoir connected therewith, shall cease, and the said new company, and the stockholders thereof, shall thereafter be the owners and in control of the said ditch, and the water of the same. Now, therefore, said second party does hereby agree with said first party that this deed, and the right of said second party to vote and have a voice in the management of the company, is subject to the limitation that said second party shall not, by reason of anything in this deed contained, or by reason of any relation he may bear to this company, arising out of said water right, be entitled to claim, demand, or receive any part or portion of any moneys arising out of the sale of any stock of said company, should the said company find it necessary to increase its capital stock; and the said second party is to be allowed a voice and vote only as relates to the said company's affairs at the time of executing this deed, and necessary to securing to said second party the fullest enjoyment of said second party's water right. It is further agreed that, if said five persons provided to be appointed to incorporate a new company should decline or fail to incorporate said new company as herein contemplated, then the first party may, within thirty days, appoint others for said purpose, and so continue to appoint persons until said company is incorporated as herein provided. And it is further agreed that the said first party will deliver said ditch to the water-right owners as aforesaid, and at the time and manner aforesaid, free of any debts against the same."

That part of the plaintiff's case which was dependent upon proof of the sale of water rights, and the payments made for them, was disposed of by a stipulation which is in the following terms:

"It is hereby agreed between opposing counsel--and the same may be taken as true, without further evidence--that there has been issued, to be satisfied from the property in controversy, by the La Junta & Lamar Canal Company and its predecessor in interest, the Arkansas River, Land, Reservoir & Canal Company, water rights representing at least ten hundred and ten (1,010) cubic feet of water per second of time, substantially in the form as set forth in the deed of the plaintiff, Hess, and that at least two-thirds of said water rights have been paid for in full, and that water deeds have
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • City of Thornton v. Bijou Irr. Co.
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 15 Octubre 1996
    ...Co., 27 Colo. 322, 61 P. 603 (1900); Wyatt v. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co., 18 Colo. 298, 33 P. 144 (1893); La Junta & Lamar Canal Co. v. Hess, 6 Colo.App. 497, 42 P. 50 (1895). The terms of the Allotment Contract clearly preclude the accrual of benefits derived from the use of CBT water t......
  • Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. Catlin Canal Co., 2
    • United States
    • Colorado Supreme Court
    • 22 Marzo 1982
    ...27 Colo. 322, 61 P. 603 (1900); Wyatt v. The Larimer and Weld Irrigation Co., 18 Colo. 298, 33 P. 144 (1893); La Junta and Lamar Canal Co. v. Hess, 6 Colo.App. 497, 42 P. 50 (1895). Based on Model, reinforced as it is by Perdue v. The Fort Lyon Canal Co., supra, Merrick v. The Fort Lyon Can......
  • Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 6 Agosto 1921
    ... ... " (Sec. 5636, C. S.; Blakely v. Ft. Lyon ... Canal Co., 31 Colo. 224, 73 P. 249; New La Junta & ... Lamar Canal Co. v. Kreybill, 17 Colo. App. 26, 67 P ... 1026; La Junta & Lamar Canal Co ... Hess, 6 Colo ... App. 497, 42 P. 50; Wyatt v. Larimer etc. Irr. Co., 18 Colo ... 298, 36 Am. St ... ...
  • McClair v. Huddart
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • 9 Septiembre 1895
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT