K.K.C., In Interest of, s. 87-0266
| Decision Date | 18 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 87-0266,87-0334,s. 87-0266 |
| Citation | 143 Wis.2d 508,422 N.W.2d 142 |
| Parties | In the Interest of K.K.C., K.M., S.M., T.S., D.L.W., and B.W. ROCK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellant, v. Richard R. DeLEU, Respondent. In the Interest of R.M.L., a person under the age of 18. R.M.L., Appellant, v. Richard R. DeLEU, Respondent. |
| Court | Wisconsin Court of Appeals |
David Heitzman, Janesville, on brief and Jerome M. Elliott, Beloit, for appellants.
Richard D. Martin, Asst. State Public Defender, for respondents.
Before GARTZKE, P.J., and EICH and SUNDBY, JJ.
The Rock County Department of Social Services appeals orders requiring that it deliver all of its files concerning seven juveniles to the trial judge in two criminal prosecutions in which Richard R. DeLeu, Jr., is charged with sexually assaulting the juveniles. The orders require the trial judge in the criminal cases to review the files in camera to determine what portions of such files should be released to DeLeu for his use in defense against the criminal charges. We conclude that sec. 48.78(2)(a), Stats., requires that the juvenile court, not the criminal court, exercise its discretion to determine whether the confidential records of the department shall be disclosed or made available for inspection. We therefore reverse.
Section 48.78(2)(a), Stats., provides:
No agency may make available for inspection or disclose the contents of any record kept or information received about an individual in its care or legal custody, except as provided under sub. (3) or s. 48.432, 48.433, 48.93, or 48.981(7) or by order of the court. (Emphasis added.)
The parties agree that "the court" as used in sec. 48.78(2)(a), Stats., refers to the juvenile court. Section 48.02(2m) provides: " 'Court,' when used without further qualification, means the court assigned to exercise jurisdiction under this chapter." The parties also agree that an order of the juvenile court under sec. 48.78(2)(a) is discretionary.
DeLeu argues that the juvenile courts exercised their discretion when they ordered the department to deliver its files to the criminal trial judge to make the in camera review. He claims that the juvenile courts considered the interest of the juveniles and the public in maintaining the confidentiality of the records, DeLeu's interest in a fair trial, and the ability of the criminal trial judge to recognize information relevant to DeLeu's defense. DeLeu contends that the judge who will preside over his criminal trials is in a better position than are the juvenile court judges to balance the competing interests of confidentiality and disclosure.
"Discretion" contemplates a process of reasoning which yields a conclusion based on logic and founded upon proper legal standards. Marriage of Mathewson v. Mathewson, 135 Wis.2d 411, 416, 400 N.W.2d 485, 487 (Ct.App.1986). Discretion does not contemplate that a court will delegate to another court the necessary process of reasoning.
We conclude that the juvenile courts did not exercise their discretion under sec. 48.78(2)(a), Stats. By ordering the department to deliver its files to the criminal trial...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Lynch
...Nearly one year after the Supreme Court of the United States decided Ritchie, our court of appeals took up In the Interest of K.K.C., 143 Wis.2d 508, 422 N.W.2d 142 (Ct.App.1988). The court reached the following conclusion regarding Ritchie:[The defendant] contends that if the trial judge i......
-
People v. Stanaway
...counseling agency as long as it is shielded by statutory privilege. State v. SH, 159 Wis.2d 730, 465 N.W.2d 238 (1990); In re KKC, 143 Wis.2d 508, 422 N.W.2d 142 (1988).32 The court analogized to cases in which the informant privilege has been abrogated by the defendant's due process right ......
-
Jennifer J. v. State, 94-2735
...a process of reasoning which yields a conclusion based on logic and founded upon proper legal standards. In re K.K.C., 143 Wis.2d 508, 510, 422 N.W.2d 142, 14344 (Ct.App.1988). A presumption of reasonableness supports the court's disposition. In re James P., 180 Wis.2d at 682, 510 N.W.2d at......
-
State v. Green
...Shiffra, 175 Wis. 2d at 606-07 (citing State v. S.H., 159 Wis. 2d 730, 736, 465 N.W.2d 238 (Ct. App. 1990), and In re K.K.C., 143 Wis. 2d 508, 511, 422 N.W.2d 142 (Ct. App. 1988)). This court recognized the validity of Shiffra in State v. Solberg, 211 Wis. 2d 372, 386-87, 564 N.W.2d 775 (19......
-
Early Steps in the Case
...the Court held that the defendant was entitled to a new trial. Ritchie has been accepted in Wisconsin. In the Interest of K.K.C., 143 Wis. 2d 508, 511, 422 N.W. 2d 142 (Ct. App. 1988); State v. Shiffra, 175 Wis.2d 600, 499 N.W. 2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993). Prior to an in camera inspection, the d......
-
Early steps in the case
...the Court held that the defendant was entitled to a new trial. Ritchie has been accepted in Wisconsin. In the Interest of K.K.C., 143 Wis. 2d 508, 511, 422 N.W. 2d 142 (Ct. App. 1988); State v. Shiffra, 175 Wis.2d 600, 499 N.W. 2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993). Prior to an in camera inspection, the d......
-
Early steps in the case
...the Court held that the defendant was entitled to a new trial. Ritchie has been accepted in Wisconsin. In the Interest of K.K.C., 143 Wis. 2d 508, 511, 422 N.W. 2d 142 (Ct. App. 1988); State v. Shiffra, 175 Wis.2d 600, 499 N.W. 2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993). Prior to an in camera inspection, the d......
-
Early Steps in the Case
...the Court held that the defendant was entitled to a new trial. Ritchie has been accepted in Wisconsin. In the Interest of K.K.C., 143 Wis. 2d 508, 511, 422 N.W. 2d 142 (Ct. App. 1988); State v. Shiffra, 175 Wis.2d 600, 499 N.W. 2d 719 (Ct. App. 1993). Prior to an in camera inspection, the d......