K.L.F., Matter of, 82654
| Decision Date | 19 July 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 82654,82654 |
| Parties | In the Matter of K.L.F., an Alleged Deprived Child. |
| Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
This appeal is dismissed because James L. Percival [counsel], in seeking review of a court-awarded attorney's fee, failed timely to comply with the cost requirements of Rule 1.14, 1 Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, and thus failed to commence his appeal within thirty days of the appealable event. 2
Counsel's attempt at avoiding the Rule 1.14 cost deposit requirements by filing an in-lieu affidavit in forma pauperis 3 was ineffective. Attached to counsel's paperwork was an affidavit 4 stating that he represented an indigent, the nominal appellant, who was without sufficient funds to pay the filing fees. The affidavit misses the mark because it is not the client but counsel who is the real party in interest on appeal. 5 Moreover, the affidavit is verified neither by the client nor by the lawyer before an officer authorized by law to administer oaths. An insufficient affidavit from the wrong affiant cannot stand as an effective substitute for the cost deposit.
The appellant-counsel neither timely paid the statutorily required $200.00 cost deposit nor placed on file, within the prescribed thirty days, the required in forma pauperis affidavit that satisfies Rule 1.14. Because the requirements for timely commencement of an appeal were not met, the lawyer's appeal is DISMISSED.
1 The pertinent terms of Rule 1.14, 12 O.S.1991, Ch. 15, App. 2, Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, provide:
"(a) Manner of Commencing Appeal. An appeal from a decision of the trial court shall be commenced by:
(1) Filing a petition in error ... with fourteen (14) copies with the Clerk of this Court within the time prescribed in Rule 1.11;
(2) Remitting to the Clerk of the Supreme Court the cost deposit provided by statute, or if the appellant is indigent, an affidavit in forma pauperis shall be filed concurrently with the petition in error. 20 O.S.1991 § 15...."
The pertinent terms of Rule 1.11, 12 O.S.1991, Ch. 15, App. 2, Rules of Appellate Procedure in Civil Cases, provide:
The pertinent terms of 20 O.S.1991 § 15 are:
"In each case filed in the Supreme Court, and at the time of filing same, there shall be deposited with the Clerk as costs in said cause Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) of which no rebate of any part thereof shall be made; provided, the Supreme Court may prescribe by rules the procedure for affording access to that Court, without the deposit of costs, to those indigent persons who are deemed entitled thereto." [Emphasis added.]
2 See 12 O.S.1993 § 990A which provides in pertinent part:
A. An appeal to the Oklahoma Supreme Court, if taken, must be commenced by filing a petition in error with the Clerk of the Oklahoma Supreme Court within thirty (30) days from the date a judgment, decree, or appealable order.... [Emphasis added.]
3 Rule 1.14 requires that if an affidavit in forma pauperis is filed concurrently with the petition in error, it "shall be in substantial compliance " with the following form:
"STATE OF OKLAHOMA
In the Supreme Court of Oklahoma: I (or we) do solemnly swear that the cause of
action set forth in the petition is just, and I (or we) do further swear that
by reason of my (or our) poverty, I am unable to give the security for costs.
__________________________________ _______________________________________
Date Affiant
_______________________________________
4 Counsel's affidavit states in pertinent part:
"COMES NOW, James L. Percival, attorney for the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Amendments to Okla. Supreme Court Rules
...or affidavit is actually delivered to the Court Clerk within the time period for perfecting the appellate procedure. Matter of K. L. F., 1994 OK 66, 878 P.2d 1067; Okla.Sup.Ct.R. 1.23. (d) Mailing by Prisoner.A prisoner's appeal is commenced on the date that he or she places the petition in......
-
Hix v. White Swan Food Services
...Bane v. Anderson, Bryant & Co., Okl., 786 P.2d 1230, 1238, 1239-1240 (Opala, V.C.J., dissenting in part) (1990); Matter of K.L.F., Okl., 878 P.2d 1067, 1068 (1994). 1 The 1992 and 1994 amendments are not applicable here. Compensation awards are governed by the law in effect when a claimant ......
-
In re Rules 1.4, 1.10, 1.25, 1.76, 1.77, 1.100, 1.102, 1.103, 1.105, 1.106, 1.193, & 1.300, & Rule 1.301 Forms 9, 10, 15, & 17 of Okla. Supreme Court Rules (Workers' Comp. Court)
...or affidavit is actually delivered to the Court Clerk within the time period for perfecting the appellate procedure. Matter of K. L. F., 1994 OK 66, 878 P.2d 1067; Okla.Sup.Ct.R. 1.23. (e) Scope of Rule 1.4(c). Rule 1.4(c) applies to petitions in error in appeals from the District Courts; p......
-
Thompson v. Independent School Dist. No. 94 of Garfield County, I-94
...the appeal as to the attorney's fee award. A post-judgment order awarding attorney's fees is an appealable order. In the Matter of K.L.F., 878 P.2d 1067, 1068-1069 (Okla.1994). On July 13, 1993 the ordered award for attorney's fees and costs was filed, commencing the running of time for app......