K. M. S. v. State, 48459

Decision Date14 September 1973
Docket NumberNo. 48459,No. 3,48459,3
Citation129 Ga.App. 683,200 S.E.2d 916
PartiesK.M.S. v. STATE of Georgia
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Lipshutz, Macey, Zusmann & Sikes, Winston H. Morriss, Jackson L. Culbreth, Atlanta, for appellant.

Thomas M. Witcher, Solicitor, Decatur, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

STOLZ, Judge.

K.M.S., a juvenile, appeals from an order (which is properly certified for immediate review) of the Juvenile Court of DeKalb County denying her motion to dismiss the petition alleging her to be delinquent. The petition in question alleged 'that said child is delinquent and is (sic) need of treatment and/or rehabilitation or supervision in the meaning of the law and that said child did on February 1, 1973 . . . commit murder when she unlawfully and with malice aforethought caused the death of Michael Anthony Street, a human being, by stabbing him with a knife.' The juvenile in question was 12 years old at the time of the fatal stabbing. Held:

The question presented is whether a juvenile court may adjudicate a child a delinquent based upon a petition alleging that the child committed an act designated a crime under Georgia law, when said child has not yet attained the age of 13 years.

'A person shall not be considered or found guilty of a crime unless he has attained the age of 13 years at the time of the act, omission, or negligence constituting the crime.' Code Ann. § 26-701 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1270). 'A crime is a violation of a statute of this State in which there shall be a union or joint operation of act, or omission to act, and intention, or criminal negligence.' Code Ann. § 26-601 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1269). Murder, of course, is a crime in Georgia. Code Ann. § 26-1101 (Ga.L.1968, pp. 1249, 1276).

Here, it is contended that, since the juvenile is under age 13, it is impossible for her to have committed the act of murder and that, since the sole delinquent act alleged in the petition was the murder, the juvenile court has no authority to find the child to be a delinquent and in need of treatment and/or rehabilitation or supervision.

The Juvenile Court Code (Ga.L.1971, p. 709) is intended to be 'liberally construed to the end that children whose well-being is threatened shall be assisted and protected and restored, if possible, as secure lawabiding members of society; and that each child coming within the jurisdiction of the court shall receive . . . the care, guidance, and control that will conduce to his welfare and the best interest of the State . . .' Code Ann. § 24A-101 (Ga.L.1971, pp. 709, 710). Among the requisite contents of a petition in the juvenile court is that it set forth plainly '(a) the facts which bring the child within the jurisdiction of the court . . .' Code Ann. § 24A-1603(a) (Ga.L.1971, pp. 709, 726). It is required as a matter of due process that the child, his parents and/or guardian have notice 'sufficiently in advance of scheduled court proceedings so that reasonable opportunity to prepare will be afforded, and it must 'set forth the alleged misconduct with particularity. " In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 33, 87 S.Ct. 1428, 1446, 18 L.Ed.2d 527. See also D.P. v. State, 129 Ga.App. 680, 200 S.E.2d 499. The aforestated allegations of the complaint satisfy the constitutional requirement as to notice. The portion thereof alleging that the child did 'commit murder,' is a legal conclusion, which in this case is surplusage. It is not the legal conclusion upon which the juvenile court may predicate a finding of this child's delinquency, but the evidence supporting the petition's allegations of fact, that on a certain day, in a certain county, by a certain means, she caused the death of a human being.

The juvenile court is a civil c...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Wilson v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • June 21, 2021
    ...from 14 years to 13 years." (Punctuation omitted.) Adams , 288 Ga. at 696 (1), 707 S.E.2d 359. Further, citing K. M. S. v. State, 129 Ga. App. 683, 685, 200 S.E.2d 916 (1973), and other Court of Appeals cases that also relied on the Committee Notes, the majority asserted that the purpose of......
  • S.L.H., In Interest of
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • July 16, 1992
    ...... is not prosecuted as a criminal, but is dealt with as the law provides for juveniles who violate the law." K.M.S. v. State of Ga., 129 Ga.App. 683, 684, 200 S.E.2d 916 (1973). The legislative history of OCGA § 16-1-8, part of which is contained in Marchman v. State, 234 Ga. 40, 42, 215 ......
  • In re Interest of D. B.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 5, 2017
    ...held that, when a sentence is void, a trial court has jurisdiction to resentence the defendant at any time.").22 K. M. S. v. State, 129 Ga.App. 683, 684, 200 S.E.2d 916 (1973) ; see OCGA § 15-11-606 ("An order of disposition or adjudication shall not be a conviction of a crime and shall not......
  • Tyvonne, In re
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1989
    ...to the present case. See, e.g., In re Gladys R., 1 Cal.3d 855, 863, 464 P.2d 127, 83 Cal.Rptr. 671 (1970); K.M.S. v. State, 129 Ga.App. 683, 685, 200 S.E.2d 916 (1973); State v. Q.D., 102 Wash.2d 19, 23, 685 P.2d 557 (1984); State v. S.P., 49 Wash.App. 45, 46, 746 P.2d 813 Some courts, howe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT