Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co.

CourtNew York Court of Appeals
Citation257 N.Y. 203,177 N.E. 421
PartiesKADE v. SANITARY FIREPROOFING & CONTRACTING CO.
Decision Date15 July 1931

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Action by Eugene Kade against the Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Company. From a judgment of the Appellate Division (227 App. Div. 622, 236 N. Y. S. 78), reversing a judgment for plaintiff and dismissing the complaint for defect of parties, and from an order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

Judgment of Appellate Division dismissing complaint reversed, and appeal from order granting new trial dismissed.

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second department.

Frank H. Hiscock, of Syracuse, and Carroll B. Low and Henry Hoelljes, both of New York City, for appellant.

Julian A. Ronan and Earl H. Gale, both of New York City, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The personal representatives of the deceased partner are not necessary parties to this action, brought by one who claims to be a surviving partner to compel an accounting by a third person in possession of the partnership assets.

The order of the Appellate Division granting a new trial is not subject to review upon this appeal from the final judgment. Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co., 256 N. Y. 371, 176 N. E. 428.

The judgment dismissing the complaint for defect of parties should be reversed, without costs.

The appeal from the order granting a new trial should be dismissed.

CARDOZO, C. J., and POUND, CRANE, LEHMAN, KELLOGG, O'BRIEN, and HUBBS, JJ., concur.

Judgment accordingly.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Daus v. Gunderman & Sons, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • July 24, 1940
    ...the new hearing, and may not be reviewed upon appeal from such final decision. Taylor v. Root, 48 N.Y. 687;Kade v. Sanitary F. & C. Co., 257 N.Y. 203, 177 N.E. 421; Cohen on The Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, p. 211. In such case this court reviews the judgment or order entered af......
  • Geraerdts' Will, In re
    • United States
    • New York Surrogate Court
    • January 23, 1961
    ...of Appeals, Kade v. Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co., 227 Page 917 App.Div. 622, 236 N.Y.S. 78; 228 App.Div. 646, 238 N.Y.S. 858; 257 N.Y. 203, N.E. 421, judgment was directed in the Supreme Court action in favor of Kade against Sanitary Fireproofing & Contracting Co. on July 3, 1934......
  • A.M. Hazell, Inc. v. City of Long Beach
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • July 15, 1931
    ...certificates. This reading of the contract is in accord with the practical construction indicated by the conduct of the parties. [257 N.Y. 203]Demand for payment was made on November 26, 1928, in respect of the installments then due, and informally thereafter, through correspondence and oth......
  • In re Tuller Const. Co.
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals
    • July 15, 1931
    ...N.Y. 206177 N.E. 421In re TULLER CONST. CO.Court of Appeals of New York.July 15, In the matter of the application of the Tuller Construction Company for a peremptory mandamus order directed to William H. Lyon and others, as Sewer Commissioners of Belgrave Sewer District, Town of North Hemps......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT