Kapinos v. City of Chicopee

Decision Date14 May 1956
Citation334 Mass. 196,134 N.E.2d 548
PartiesStanley KAPINOS, and others v. CITY OF CHICOPEE and others.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

James F. Egan, Springfield, for petitioners.

Foster Furculo, Springfield, for respondents.

Before QUA, C. J., and RONAN, WILKINS, COUNIHAN and WHITTEMORE, JJ.

COUNIHAN, Justice.

This is a petition under G.L. (Ter.Ed.) c. 40, § 53, brought by Stanley Kapinos and fifteen other taxpayers of the city of Chicopee against the city, the mayor, members of the board of water commissioners of the city, hereinafter called the board, and the A. E. Williams Construction Co., Inc., and the Enfield Road Construction Co., Inc., hereinafter called the construction companies. The petition seeks to have declared null and void a contract entered into between the board and the construction companies for the removal of 'fill' from certain land of the city under the control of the board and also to restrain the construction companies from doing any further work under the contract. The case comes here upon what is in effect an appeal from a final decree dismissing the petition after interlocutory decrees sustaining demurrers. There was no error.

The facts alleged in the petition which must be taken as true upon demurrer are essentially as follows: On May 9, 1954, the board voted to lease certain land of the city to the construction companies for the purpose of permitting them to remove 'fill' therefrom. This so-called lease, which is in effect the contract complained of as illegal, reads as follows:

'Lease Agreement

'Agreement made this 14 day of June 1954, by and between the Water Commissioners of the City of Chicopee, Chicopee, Massachusetts hereinafter called the Lessor and A. E. Williams Construction Co., Inc. & Enfield Road Construction Co., Inc., Coadventurers, 4 Locust Street, Hartford 14, Connecticut hereinafter called the Lessee as follows:

'The Lessee hereby leases from the Lessor city owned property near Westover Air Force Base, Chicopee Falls, Massachusetts, East of Pendleton Avenue and South-Southeast of Cooley Brook. Said lease to permit removal of fill during the period of construction at Westover Air Force Base. Upon completion of fill removal, Lessee shall grade and slope disturbed areas after disposing of trees, stumps, and brush.

'The Lessor hereby agrees to accept and the Lessee to pay two thousand dollars ($2000) in full satisfaction of the Lease Agreement. Five hundred dollars ($500) to be paid upon completion of this document, five hundred dollars ($500) on November 15, 1954, and the balance, one thousand dollars ($1000) on or about June 1955.'

The present petition was filed on May 18, 1955, and on May 23, 1955, the parties entered into and filed a stipulation in which the construction companies agreed not to remove any more 'fill' during the pendency of this suit. The construction companies had entered upon the leased premises and had removed 'fill' for a period of about eleven months prior to the filing of this petition. They had paid the city $1,000 during that period and nothing thereafter presumably because of the stipulation.

The petitioners allege that the lease or contract was entered into without compliance with the charter of the city and that the board had no power to impose such contractual obligations and liabilities upon the city.

The only issue before us is whether the petitioners in these circumstances are entitled to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Seideman v. City of Newton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • October 24, 2008
    ...inhabitants" entitled to relief in equity if town is "about to" raise or expend money, or incur obligations); Kapinos v. Chicopee, 334 Mass. 196, 198, 134 N.E.2d 548 (1956). ...
  • Policastro v. Boston
    • United States
    • Massachusetts Superior Court
    • November 8, 2005
    ...in these cases, the petitioners were seeking to enjoin municipal actions that were entirely or almost entirely completed. See e.g. Kapinos, 334 Mass. at 196-99 (finding that were too late to challenge the lease of city-owned land permitting lessee construction company to remove fill from th......
  • Fred C. McClean Heating Supplies, Inc. v. Westfield Trade High School Bldg. Committee of City of Westfield
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 24, 1962
    ...381. The averments of the bill and exhibits annexed thereto, which for purposes of demurrer must be taken as true, Kapinos v. Chicopee, 334 Mass. 196, 197, 134 N.E.2d 548, are, in brief, that McClean submitted, on the form furnished by the committee, filled out and complete in every respect......
  • Policastro v. Boston, 20 Mass. L. Rptr. 273 (MA 11/8/2005), 044279.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • November 8, 2005
    ...this interpretation "that a taxpayer's petition will lie only before such obligations are incurred and not afterwards." Kapinos v. Chicopee, 334 Mass. 196, 198 (1956), see also Fuller, 252 Mass. at 260; Ayscough v. Andover, 19 Mass.App.Ct. 125, 127-28 (1984). However, in these cases, the pe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT