Karchesky v. State

Decision Date09 July 1987
Docket NumberNo. 86-1440,86-1440
Citation12 Fla. L. Weekly 1657,509 So.2d 403
Parties12 Fla. L. Weekly 1657 Marcus E. KARCHESKY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Daniel J. Schafer, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Pamela D. Cichon, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

COWART, Judge.

Marcus E. Karchesky, defendant, appeals a final judgment and sentence claiming a violation of his constitutional guarantee against being placed in jeopardy twice for the same offense.

On October 13, 1985, defendant engaged in sexual intercourse with the twelve year old daughter of his live-in girlfriend. As a result of this single act of intercourse, defendant was charged with and convicted of section 794.05, Florida Statutes (1985) (carnal intercourse with an unmarried person under eighteen), section 800.04(2), Florida Statutes (1985) (commission of an act defined as sexual battery upon a child under sixteen), and section 800.04(1), Florida Statutes (1985) (lewd assault or act upon a child under sixteen).

As a result of two subsequent, separate and distinct acts of sexual intercourse with this same victim, the defendant was likewise charged and convicted of two more counts of section 794.05, two more counts of section 800.04(2), and two more counts of section 800.04(1).

In Young v. State, 506 So.2d 13 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987), we reluctantly held that under State v. Lanier, 464 So.2d 1192 (Fla.1985) lewd assault must be considered a necessarily lesser offense of section 794.011(5), sexual battery (with or without chastity and consent) in prosecutions where the victim is twelve to sixteen years of age. In the instant case, the victim was a child twelve years of age. Therefore, when the defendant was charged with sexual battery under section 794.05, Florida Statutes (1985) (carnal intercourse with an unmarried person under eighteen), the charges under section 800.04(1) and section 800.04(2) were simply redundant as they were lesser included offenses of the charge of sexual battery, section 794.05. 1

Therefore, because there were only three separate factual events and, under Lanier, only three crimes charged (although erroneously broken down into nine separate counts), there can be only three valid convictions for the three separate acts of sexual intercourse.

We affirm the three convictions under section 794.05, Florida Statutes (1985) and reverse the three convictions under section 800.04(1), Florida Statutes (1985), and the three convictions under section 800.04(2), Florida Statutes (1985).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

1 State v. Hightower 509 So.2d 1078 (Fla.1987) holds that section 800.04 is not a lesser included offense of section 794.011(2). Hightower is distinguishable from this case because (1...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Karchesky v. State, 89-1970
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 4 Octubre 1990
    ...of whether victim injury can be scored under section 794.05. Karchesky v. State, 534 So.2d 413 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Karchesky v. State, 509 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). We Before the victim injury points can be considered, Karchesky must first overcome the hurdle of whether Rule 3.800(a) ......
  • Fenelon v. State, 92-1001
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 15 Diciembre 1993
    ...and GUNTHER, J., concur. 1 See Sec. 794.041(2)(b), Fla.Stat. (1991).2 See Sec. 794.011(2), Fla.Stat. (1991).3 See Karchesky v. State, 509 So.2d 403 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).4 See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7) (1986) ("Victim injury shall be scored if it is an element of any offenses at conviction.")......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT