Katama Land Co. v. Jernegan

Citation126 Mass. 155
PartiesKatama Land Company v. Alexander Jernegan
Decision Date21 January 1879
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts

Argued October 25, 1878

Dukes County. Contract upon an agreement signed by the defendant and others, to recover an assessment made by the plaintiff corporation on ten shares of stock standing in the name of the defendant. The parts of the agreement now material to be stated were as follows: "Whereas, by act of the Legislature of Massachusetts in the year 1872, Erastus P Carpenter, Joel H. Hills, Grafton N. Collins, and Nathaniel M. Jernegan, their associates and successors, are created a corporation, under the name of the Katama Land Company, for the purpose of purchasing, holding, improving, and disposing of land in the town of Edgartown, the capital stock of which corporation is fixed at fifty thousand dollars; now therefore, the undersigned hereby associate themselves together to form said corporation, and severally subscribe for and agree each with the other and with said corporation to take the number of shares in said corporation affixed to their respective names, and to pay therefor the sum of one hundred dollars per share, at such times as shall be determined, upon the organization of said corporation Provided, however, that the subscription shall not be binding until the whole amount of said capital stock shall have been subscribed." Opposite the defendant's name were written the words "ten shares."

Trial in the Superior Court, before Rockwell, J., who ruled that the plaintiff could not maintain the action upon the evidence introduced by it, and reported the case for the consideration of this court. The nature of the evidence appears in the opinion.

Judgment for the defendant.

J. Brown, for the plaintiff.

T. M. Stetson & F. B. Greene, for the defendant.

Morton J. Endicott & Lord JJ., absent.

OPINION

Morton, J.

It is the well settled law of this Commonwealth, that a subscription for shares in a corporation, authorized by law to lay assessments upon shares and to sell the shares for the nonpayment of such assessments, does not impose any personal liability upon the subscriber to pay assessments upon the shares, unless he has expressly promised to do so. Mechanics' Foundry & Machine Co. v. Hall, 121 Mass. 272, and cases cited. This action, therefore, can only be maintained upon the ground that the subscription paper signed by the defendant binds him to pay the assessment sued for.

The subscription paper provides that whereas the Katama Land Company has been incorporated, "the capital stock of which corporation is fixed at fifty thousand dollars; now therefore, the undersigned hereby associate themselves together to form said corporation, and severally subscribe for and agree each...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Scott v. Houpt
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Arkansas
    • 19 Noviembre 1904
    ... ... other person having such notice take a conveyance of the land ... covered by the prior deed, he will take it subject to any ... right, title or interest ... ...
  • Eaton v. Pac. Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • 23 Marzo 1887
    ...make her take 43 shares when she had only agreed to take 40. People's Ferry Co. v. Balch, 8 Gray, 303, 314;Katama Land Co. v. Jernegan, 126 Mass. 155. It is not necessary in this case to consider whether the assumed post mortem increase of 4,613 shares was valid or not, for it was not the i......
  • Eaton v. Pacific Nat. Bank
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • 23 Marzo 1887
    ... ... to take 40. People's Ferry Co. v. Balch, 8 Gray, ... 303, 314; Katama Land Co. v. Jernegan, 126 Mass ... 155. It is not necessary in this case to consider whether the ... ...
  • Anglo-American Land Mortgage & Agency Co. v. Dyer
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts
    • 18 Junio 1902
    ...that the capital stock had not all been subscribed for when the assessments were made, and that, therefore, under Land Co. v. Jernegan, 126 Mass. 155, and other cases decided in this commonwealth, the action cannot be maintained. The articles of association provide that ‘the nominal capital......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT