Kealoha v. County of Hawaii
| Citation | 74 Haw. 650,847 P.2d 263 |
| Parties | Kealoha (Jason) v. County of Hawaii NO. 15963 |
| Decision Date | 01 February 1993 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Hawai'i |
To continue reading
Request your trial
52 cases
-
Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd., No. 20709.
...944 P.2d 1279, 1293 (1997) (quoting Kealoha v. County of Hawaii, 74 Haw. 308, 319, 844 P.2d 670, 676, reconsideration denied, 74 Haw. 650, 847 P.2d 263 (1993)). "`Evidentiary decisions based on HRE Rule 403, which require a `judgment call' on the part of the trial court, are reviewed for an......
-
84 Hawai'i 1, State v. Arceo
...review is the right/wrong standard. Kealoha v. County of Hawaii, 74 Haw. 308, 319, 844 P.2d 670, 676, reconsideration denied, 74 Haw. 650, 847 P.2d 263 (1993). Where the evidentiary ruling at issue concerns admissibility based upon relevance, under ... [HRE] Rules 401 and 402, the proper st......
-
78 Hawai'i 287, Craft v. Peebles
...294] rule of evidence at issue." Kealoha v. County of Hawai'i, 74 Haw. 308, 319, 844 P.2d 670, 676, reconsideration denied, 74 Haw. 650, 847 P.2d 263 (1993). "When application of a particular evidentiary rule can yield only one correct result, the proper standard for appellate review is the......
-
82 Hawai'i 57, Mathewson v. Aloha Airlines, Inc.
..."can yield only one correct result." Kealoha v. County of Hawaii, 74 Haw. 308, 319, 844 P.2d 670, 676, reconsideration denied, 74 Haw. 650, 847 P.2d 263 (1993).State v. Wallace, 80 Hawai'i 382, 409, 910 P.2d 695, 722 (1996) (footnotes omitted).7 We note that, at paragraph 1 of Aloha's answe......
Request a trial to view additional results