Kedzie v. West Chicago Park Com'rs

Decision Date13 June 1885
Citation114 Ill. 280,2 N.E. 182
PartiesKEDZIE and others v. WEST CHICAGO PARK COM'RS.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Appeal from Cook.

Hutchinson & Luff and Judd & Whitehouse, for appellants, John H. Kedzie and others.

Geo. W. Smith, forappellees, West Chicago Park Com'rs.

PER CURIAM.

Circumstances that were unavoidable have prevented the preparation and filing of an opinion in this case at an earlier day. We are notified by counsel that longer delay in announcing a decision will be highly prejudicial to the rights of the parties, and, at their earnest solicitation, we have suspended the current business of the June term long enough to dispose of the case. But in consequence of the many duties pressing upon us, arising from the holding of daily sessions, we are constrained to be content with announcing the conclusions we have reached upon the questions discussed in the arguments submitted, without setting forth at length the reasons which have induced those conclusions.

We hold (1) that West Chicago park commissioners are a quasi municipal corporation for park purposes, and that they have power to take the steps to cause the property to be specially assessed for the cost of the boulevard that were here taken by them. (2) Section 12 of the act in regard to the completion, improvement, and management of public parks and boulevards, and to provide a more efficient remedy for the collection of delinquent assessments, approved May 2, 1873, (Rev. St. 1874, p. 747,) relates to a new and entirely different subject-matter, one not provided for in the original act relating to the West Chicago park, and invests the West Chicago park commissioners with a power they did not before have. The language therein, ‘and the cost and expense of acquiring title to such land shall be levied upon and collected by special assessment upon the property deemed specially benefited by the location of such boulevard or pleasure-way in the same manner as the cost of other lands for parks and boulevards is assessed under the several acts creating such boards,’ means that the same shall be done by and through the same agencies or instrumentalities, and so, as applied to the present cases, by and through the agencies or instrumentalities provided by section 13 of the act of February 27, 1869, creating these commissioners. We do not think section 4 of the act of May 2, 1873, compelled action in this proceeding, pursuant to its terms. And we hold section 13, supra,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Kansas City v. Bacon
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 30, 1900
    ... ... Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356; Railroad v. Chicago, 166 ... U.S. 226; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U.S. 366. The ... Railroad, 133 Mo. 313; ... Village of Morgan Park v. Wishall, 40 N.E. 611; ... Hickman v. City of Kansas, ... Dist. Court of Hennepin Co., 33 Minn. 235; Kedzie v ... West Chicago Park Coms., 114 Ill. 280; Brooklyn ... ...
  • Kansas City v. Bacon
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1898
    ...Foster v. Park Comm., 133 Mass. 338; Matter of Comm. Central Park, 63 Barb. 282; State v. Dist. Court, 33 Minn. 235; Kedzie v. West Chicago Park Comm., 114 Ill. 280; Brooklyn Park Comm. v. Armstrong, 45 N.Y. Briggs v. Whitney, 34 N.E. 179; Briggs v. Whitney, 159 Mass. 97; People v. Brislin,......
  • Corrigan v. Kansas City
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • May 13, 1908
    ... ... 2. Because the rate is ... not the same in all the park districts; therefore, it is ... violative of section 3, ... the assessment of real estate in said West Park District made ... for general city purposes in said ... Scammon v ... Chicago, 42 Ill. 192; Chicago v. Baer, 41 Ill ... 306; ... District Court of Hennepin Co., 33 Minn. 235; Kedzie ... v. West Chicago Park Comsrs. 114 Ill. 280; Brooklyn ... ...
  • Edward J. Berwind, Inc. v. Chicago Park Dist.
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • March 20, 1946
    ...51 Ill. 37;Wilcox v. People, 90 Ill. 186;West Chicago Park Com'rs v. Western Union Tel. Co., 103 Ill. 33, and Kedzie v. West Chicago Park Com'rs, 114 Ill. 280, 2 N.E. 182. In other cases they are spoken of as ‘municipal corporations,’ without any qualifying word. People v. Walsh, 96 Ill. 23......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT