O'Keefe v. O'Keefe
Decision Date | 25 February 1946 |
Docket Number | 4-7837 |
Parties | O'Keefe v. O'Keefe |
Court | Arkansas Supreme Court |
Appeal from Jackson Chancery Court; J. Paul Ward, Chancellor.
Affirmed.
H S. Grant, for appellant.
The question at issue in this appeal is whether appellant, Frank O'Keefe, proved a legal residence in the State of Arkansas.
On February 8, 1945, Frank O'Keefe filed this suit for divorce against Pearl O'Keefe; and the complaint contained legally sufficient allegations. The defendant was constructively summoned, but made no appearance. On June 27, 1945, evidence was heard in open court. Frank O'Keefe testified that the parties were married and separated in Pennsylvania; that he was living in Pennsylvania when he joined the armed forces of the United States; that, at the time of testifying, he was a private first class in the U. S. Marine Corps, and stationed at the Marine camp near Newport; that his duties were the maintenance of telephone lines at the Newport Air Base; that he was not required to sleep at the base, and that he maintained a room elsewhere. The witness answered the court's questions as follows: "
The only attempted corroboration of residence was the testimony of the tax assessor of Jackson county, who stated that just a few days prior to June 27, 1945, the date of the hearing, Frank O'Keefe had assessed a poll tax in Jackson county. The court observed that this occurred after the filing of the suit. Without any other evidence being offered on the question of the residence of the plaintiff, the trial court ruled that the plaintiff had not proved a legal residence in Arkansas. From that decree there is this appeal. We affirm the chancery court. Several points present themselves.
I. Residence of Person in the Armed Forces. We have several recent cases on the question of residence of one in the armed forces. Some of these cases are: Kennedy v. Kennedy, 205 Ark. 650, 169 S.W.2d 876, and Mohr v. Mohr, 206 Ark. 1094, 178 S.W.2d 502. There is an exhaustive annotation on "Domicile or Residence of Person in the Armed Forces" in 148 A. L. R. 1413. This annotation is supplemented in 157 A. L. R. 1462, where the intervening supplementary annotations are listed. In Mohr v. Mohr, supra, we said:
It is legally possible for a person in the armed forces to acquire a residence in Arkansas, but it is a question of fact in each case.
II. Proof of Residence Is Required. But, even giving the plaintiff's testimony, as above referred to, its full force and effect, still the plaintiff did not sufficiently prove a legal residence in Arkansas for the time required under our statute. Section 4386 of Pope's Digest says, in part: "The plaintiff, to obtain a divorce, must prove . . in addition to a legal cause of divorce: . . . a residence in the state . . . for two months next before the commencement of the action." The evidence in this case fails to show when the plaintiff came to Arkansas, so, even under his own testimony, he did...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cassen v. Cassen
..."The evidence in this case is not sufficient to show that appellee ever became a bona fide resident of Arkansas." In O'Keefe v. O'Keefe, 209 Ark. 837, 192 S.W.2d 556, 557, we quoted from Mohr v. Mohr, 206 Ark. 1094, 1095, 178 S.W.2d 502, as follows [209 Ark. 837, 192 S.W.2d 557]: "`Without ......
- Wilde v. Wilde
-
Crane v. Crane
...Ark. 1094, 178 S.W.2d 502; Feldstein v. Feldstein, 208 Ark. 928, 188 S.W.2d 295; O'Keefe v. O'Keefe, 209 Ark. 837, 192 S.W.2d 556. In the O'Keefe case we quoted from the Mohr "'There are cases which hold that a person in the service of the United States may acquire residence in a state wher......
-
Crane v. Crane
...650, 169 S.W.2d 876; Mohr v. Mohr, 206 Ark. 1094, 178 S.W.2d 502; Feldstein v. Feldstein, 208 Ark. 928, 188 S.W.2d 295; O'Keefe v. O'Keefe, Ark. 192 S.W.2d 556, 557. In the O'Keefe case we quoted from the Mohr "`There are cases which hold that a person in the service of the United States ma......