Kellar v. Moore, 1D01-4008.

Decision Date01 July 2002
Docket NumberNo. 1D01-4008.,1D01-4008.
Citation820 So.2d 1015
PartiesRayl Lynn KELLAR, Petitioner, v. Michael W. MOORE, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Petitioner, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; Caryl Kilinski, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court reached the right result for the wrong reason. "Mandamus is a narrow, extraordinary writ used to coerce an official to perform a clear legal duty." Sica v. Singletary, 714 So.2d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). "Although mandamus is a legal remedy, the granting of the writ is governed by equitable principles." Shevin ex rel. State v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 333 So.2d 9, 12 (Fla.1976). "Just as equitable remedies are unavailable when there is an adequate remedy at law, Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); City of Jacksonville v. Giller, 102 Fla. 92, 135 So. 549 (1931), so relief by mandamus is unavailable unless `no other adequate remedy exists.' State ex rel. Blatt v. Panelfab Int'l Corp., 314 So.2d 196, 198 (Fla.App.3d DCA 1975); Moneyhun v. Purdy, 258 So.2d 505 (Fla.App.3d DCA 1972)." Shevin, 333 So.2d at 12. Other adequate legal remedies do exist here. See, e.g., Abbott v. City of Fort Lauderdale, 783 So.2d 1213, 1214-15 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)

. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Point Conversions, LLC v. Pfeffer & Marin Holdings, LLC
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 29, 2020
    ...there is an adequate remedy at law, so relief by mandamus is unavailable unless no other adequate remedy exists." Kellar v. Moore, 820 So. 2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).2 These firmly established requirements have been articulated for hun......
  • K.G. Mother of N.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Children
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 26, 2011
    ...of law or that there is no adequate legal remedy. See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing “that the trial court made......
  • Fuller v. Truncale
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 2010
    ...v. Smithers, 743 So.2d 605, 606 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). 2 See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). 3 See State v. Smith, 951 So.2d 954, 958 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007). 4 See Taylor v. TGI Friday's, Inc., 16 So.3d 312, 313 ......
  • A.G. v. Fla. Dep't of Children
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 26, 2011
    ...of law or that there is no adequate legal remedy. See Egan v. City of Miami, 130 Fla. 465, 178 So. 132, 133 (1938); Kellar v. Moore, 820 So.2d 1015, 1016 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). A petitioner can demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of the law by showing “that the trial court......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT