O'Kelley v. Hayes, 49420

Decision Date14 June 1974
Docket NumberNo. 49420,No. 2,49420,2
Citation132 Ga.App. 134,207 S.E.2d 641
PartiesCharles E. O'KELLEY v. Minnie A. HAYES
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Charles E. Muskett, East Point, for appellant.

Johnston & McCarter, Ralph E. Carlisle, Atlanta, for appellee.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

STOLZ, Judge.

1. The motion of the plaintiff to dismiss the appeal before this court is denied.

( a) The failure to include in the enumeration of errors the jurisdiction statement required by Rule 14(c) (Code Ann. § 24-3614(c)), affords no basis for dismissal. Sparks v. Sparks, 125 Ga.App. 198(1), 186 S.E.2d 780 and cits.

( b) A mere statement of what occurred during the trial, and the contentions of the appellant, does not constitute an argument in support of such contentions; nor do the statements in the enumeration of errors (which is used in lieu of an argument in the brief) that the jury was probably influenced by this testimony constitute any argument relating to its alleged erroneous admission, as required by Rule 18(a)(3) (Code Ann. § 24-3618(a)(3)). Harrell v. Bedgood, 121 Ga.App. 16, 18, 172 S.E.2d 485. The failure to support the enumerated errors by citation of authority or argument either in the brief or in oral argument, constitutes an abandonment of such enumerated errors, but is not grounds for dismissal of the appeal. Rodriguez v. Newby, 131 Ga.App. 651(5), 206 S.E.2d 585 and cits. 'A failure to follow the rules will result in a refusal to pass on the alleged error.' Home Indemn. Co. v. Godley, 122 Ga.App. 356(6b), 177 S.E.2d 105. Accordingly, the enumerated errors raising the special grounds of the motion for new trial, being supported by citation of authority or argument in neither the brief nor the oral argument, are deemed abandoned.

5. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in overruling the motion for new trial on the general grounds in this action for damages for personal injuries, in which the plaintiff recovered a $2,000 verdict and judgment. There was evidence which authorized the finding that the plaintiff lawfully stopped her automobile on the entrance ramp to an interstate highway; that another vehicle stopped behind the plaintiff's vehicle; that the defendant's automobile struck the automobile behind the plaintiff's, knocking it into hers; and that she sustained injuries and pain and suffering as a proximate cause of the defendant's negligence in striking the vehicle behind hers.

Judgment affirmed.

EBERHARDT, P.J.,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
23 cases
  • Berman v. Rubin, 51940
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 13 Mayo 1976
    ...his appeal on Count 2 of the complaint, since it has been argued neither in his brief nor during oral argument. O'Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga.App. 134, 207 S.E.2d 641.2 For example, the tactical decisions made during the course of litigation require, by their nature, that the attorney be given ......
  • Jones v. State, 58314
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 23 Abril 1980
    ...by argument or citation of authority and is deemed abandoned. Abrams v. State, 223 Ga. 216(6), 154 S.E.2d 443; O'Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga.App. 134, 135, 207 S.E.2d 641. 4. Appellant urges that the state failed to present sufficient evidence to carry the burden of proof to convict the appella......
  • Coe v. Greenville Credit & Inv. Co.
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 23 Noviembre 1982
    ...282 S.E.2d 139 (1981); Hull v. Campbell, 130 Ga.App. 637, 204 S.E.2d 312 (1974)) or a jurisdictional statement (O'Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga.App. 134(1)(a), 207 S.E.2d 641 [1974] ). Cowart v. Webster, 152 Ga.App. 542, 263 S.E.2d 277 (1979), relied upon by appellees to urge dismissal for failur......
  • Mutual Ben. Health & Acc. Ass'n v. Reed
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 3 Febrero 1978
    ...meet the requirements of Rule 18 (Code Ann. § 24-3618) requiring argument or citation of authority, else abandoned. O'Kelley v. Hayes, 132 Ga.App. 134(1b), 207 S.E.2d 641. No ruling will be made on this enumeration of error, except to point out that a casual examination of the charge does n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT