Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Hamilton
Decision Date | 02 March 1936 |
Docket Number | No. 18528.,18528. |
Citation | 91 S.W.2d 193 |
Parties | KELLY-SPRINGFIELD TIRE CO., APPELLANT, v. ANNE HAMILTON ET AL., RESPONDENTS. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court of Jackson County. — Hon. Ben Terte, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Gilmore, Brown & Gilmore for appellant.
Ayers Blocher for respondents.
This is a suit on account against a debtor and an alleged guarantor.
The plaintiff, the Kelly-Springfield Tire Company, is shown to be a New York Corporation, successor to the Springfield Tire Company of New Jersey.
For some years prior to July 6, 1932, the New Jersey Corporation was licensed to and was doing business in Missouri and had an office in Kansas City, Missouri. On the above date, the New Jersey Corporation filed affidavit of retirement from Missouri.
On or about March 10, 1932, the defendant Steiguer executed a written guaranty agreement to the New Jersey Corporation that was then licensed to and was doing business in Missouri.
The matters concerned in this appeal are based upon the guaranty which is as follows, to-wit:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Harris Trust and Sav. Bank v. Stephans, 80-1937
...guaranty. Defendants contend that special guaranties are not enforceable by successor obligees, citing Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Hamilton (1936), 230 Mo.App. 430, 91 S.W.2d 193; Burkhardt v. Bank of America Nat'l Trust & Sav. Ass'n (1953), 127 Colo. 251, 256 P.2d 234; Lee v. Rubin (Fla.......
-
Modern Textile, Inc., In re
...held that a special guaranty may not be assigned to another without the guarantor's consent, see Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Hamilton, 230 Mo.App. 430, 91 S.W.2d 193, 195 (1936); Dunham v. Hinton, 332 Mo. 517, 58 S.W.2d 439-40 (Mo.1933); Jobes v. Miller, 201 Mo.App. 45, 209 S.W. 549, 550 ......
-
Sinclair Marketing, Inc. v. Siepert
...without any discussion as to the language of the contract and/or intentions of the parties. E.g., Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Hamilton, 230 Mo.App. 430, 91 S.W.2d 193 (1936) (enforcement of an assigned guaranty was barred even though contract stated it "shall inure to the benefit of the c......
-
Four-Three-O-Six Duncan Corp. v. Security Trust Co.
...'which imposes different responsibilities than those imposed in the contract to which it is collaterial.' Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Hamilton, 230 Mo.App. 430, 91 S.W.2d 193, 195; Ireland v. Shukert, 238 Mo.App. 78, 177 S.W.2d 10, 14[5, 6]; Squires v. Hoffman, Mo.App., 278 S.W. 803, 804[......