Kelly v. Hopkins

Decision Date13 May 1898
Docket Number10,988 - (90)
Citation75 N.W. 374,72 Minn. 258
PartiesJESSIE KELLY v. D. C. HOPKINS
CourtMinnesota Supreme Court

Appeal by Jessie Kelly, widow of Frank C. Kelly, deceased, from an order of the district court for Watonwan county, Severance, J., denying a motion to dismiss an appeal from the probate court of said county. Dismissed.

SYLLABUS

Order Refusing to Dismiss Appeal from Probate Court not Appealable.

An order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss an appeal is not appealable.

Charles Cooley and Ashley Coffman, for appellant.

W. S. Hammond, for respondent.

OPINION

START, C.J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court denying a motion to dismiss the appeal of the administrator of the estate of Frank C. Kelly, deceased, from an order of the probate court refusing to set aside its previous order making an allowance to the appellant as the widow of the deceased. The respondent moves this court to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that such an order is not appealable. The motion must be granted, for an order of the district court refusing to dismiss an appeal is not appealable. It does not involve the merits of the action or any part thereof. It is not an order which, in effect, determines the case and prevents a judgment from which an appeal may be taken, or a final order affecting a substantial right in a special proceeding. See McMahon v. Davidson, 12 Minn. 232 (357); Gurney v. City of St. Paul, 36 Minn. 163, 30 N.W. 661; Exley v. Berryhill, 36 Minn. 117, 30 N.W. 436; Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Menage, 66 Minn. 447, 69 N.W. 224.

Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Hinton v. Eastern Railway Company of Minnesota
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 23 Mayo 1898
  • McGinty v. Kelley
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 23 Diciembre 1901
    ... ... prevents a judgment from which an appeal may be taken, or a ... final order affecting a substantial right in a special ... proceeding. Kellyding. Kelly v. Hopkins ... ...
  • Vokich v. Inland Coal & Dock Co.
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • 14 Octubre 1938
    ... ... the merits of the action or any part thereof. Accord: ... Minnesota Central R. Co. v. Peterson, 31 Minn. 42, ... 16 N.W. 456; Kelly v. Hopkins, 72 Minn. 258, 75 N.W ... 374; State ex rel. School District v. County of ... Lincoln, 129 Minn. 300, 152 N.W. 541; State ex rel ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT