Kelly v. Levandoski
| Decision Date | 11 August 2005 |
| Citation | 825 N.E.2d 850,841 N.E.2d 179 |
| Parties | KELLY v. LEVANDOSKI. |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
Transfer denied.
All Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Valley Forge Ins. Co. v. Iron
...liablefor contracts that bind their principals even when the agent is the one who made the contract. See Kelly v. Levandoski, 825 N.E.2d 850, 858 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005). When a policyholder sues an agent of an insurance company with whom the policyholder wasn't in privity, the claims against ......
-
RUDOLPH v. ROSS
...all of the above, in this case we choose to adhere to our preference for deciding cases on their merits. See Kelly v. Levandoski, 825 N.E.2d 850, 856 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied. Accordingly, we evaluate whether Rudolph has revealed a genuine issue of material fact that would have p......
-
Harrison v. Turner
...cases on the merits, we will adjudicate Harrison's appeal based upon the designated evidence before us. See Kelly v. Levandoski, 825 N.E.2d 850, 856 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005).B. Analysis Harrison's claim under 42 U.S.C. §1983 alleged that Nurse Turner and Nurse Hric violated his Eighth Amendment......
-
Bergerson v. Bergerson
...defendant to retain the benefit without paying for it would be unjust and that the plaintiff expected payment. Kelly v. Levandoski, 825 N.E.2d 850, 860-61 (Ind.Ct.App.2005) (citations omitted), trans. denied 841 N.E.2d 179 According to Patrick, they never asked Michael whether they could ma......
Request a trial to view additional results