Kelly v. State, 90-2190

Decision Date28 May 1992
Docket NumberNo. 90-2190,90-2190
PartiesClifford L. KELLY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. 599 So.2d 727, 17 Fla. L. Week. D1376
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Appellant, pro se.

WOLF, Judge.

This case is before us pursuant to a Peremptory Writ of Mandamus which directs this court to rule on the trial court's disposition of petitioner's motion to correct an illegal sentence, pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. We find the relief sought by the petitioner was not available pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, and affirm the trial court's disposition.

When this case was previously before this court, we remanded to the trial court for attachment of portions of the record which indicated that appellant agreed as part of his plea to the scoring of 200 points for victim injury on his guideline scoresheet. Kelly v. State, 578 So.2d 342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The opinion issued by this court did not expressly say that the case was reversed, nor did it specifically rule on the propriety of the defendant's motion. Following that opinion, the circuit court did provide us with a transcript of the proceedings below. In the meantime, the appellant filed a number of motions indicating that the circuit court had not complied with our previous opinion. This court denied all the appellant's motions by unpublished orders which indicated that the circuit court had, in fact, complied. These orders, however, did not directly rule on the trial court's disposition of the original motion. It is on this basis that the supreme court issued the peremptory writ.

Since the time of our first opinion, both this court and the second district have addressed whether a sentence issued pursuant to a plea based upon an incorrect scoresheet constitutes an illegal sentence. In Gainer v. State, 590 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), this court held that the sentence imposed in that case was not rendered illegal because of a scoresheet error which caused it to exceed the guidelines range. Thus, a contention such as the one in this case is not properly raised pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, which deals with correcting an illegal sentence. Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1991). See also Gainer, supra.

The appropriate mechanism for seeking such relief is either a request to withdraw the plea, a timely appeal, or a timely motion filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Harper v. State, 92-2344
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 1994
    ...denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla.1992); Rouse v. State, 601 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 604 So.2d 487 (Fla.1992); Kelly v. State, 599 So.2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); and Simmons v. State, 579 So.2d 874 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). The state's reliance on the above cases is misplaced, in that no......
  • Nowlin v. State, 93-2153
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 12, 1994
    ...crime charged." Rouse v. State, 601 So.2d 281 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), rev. denied, 604 So.2d 487 (Fla. 1992). See also, Kelly v. State, 599 So.2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). As Judge Altenbernd noted in Brown, a challenge to the adequacy of determining a factual basis for a plea is not an allegat......
  • Skidmore v. State, 96-2343
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1997
    ...3.800 motion as long as it does not exceed the statutory maximum. McGuire v. State, 654 So.2d 1305 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Kelly v. State, 599 So.2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Gainer v. State, 590 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). This is because a plea bargain is a valid reason for a departure se......
  • Jones v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 14, 1994
    ...the sentence imposed exceeds the statutory maximum sentence for the crime charged." The state also cited our opinion in Kelly v. State, 599 So.2d 727 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), for the proposition that Rule 3.800 is not the appropriate mechanism to challenge the legality of a prima facie legal se......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT