Kelly v. State
Decision Date | 22 September 1982 |
Docket Number | No. 62289,62289 |
Citation | 640 S.W.2d 605 |
Parties | Fred KELLY, Jr., Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. |
Court | Texas Court of Criminal Appeals |
Nick Warden, McKinney, on appeal only, for appellant.
Tom O'Connell, Dist. Atty., and Bill Schultz, Asst. Dist. Atty., McKinney, Robert Huttash, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.
Before ONION, P.J., and ROBERTS and McCORMICK, JJ.
The appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery. The trial court assessed punishment at confinement for ten years.
In his first ground of error, the appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his court-appointed counsel's motion to withdraw and erred in refusing to hold a hearing on the motion.
The motion to withdraw as counsel stated:
"NOW COMES, Richard Abernathy, court appointed attorney for Fred Kelly, Jr., in the above-referenced cause and makes this his motion to withdraw and would show the court the following:
I.
"On July 14, 1978, Richard Abernathy, a licensed attorney in the State of Texas, was appointed by the Honorable John McCraw to Represent Fred Kelly, Jr., in the above-referenced cause.
II.
"Said accused, Fred Kelly, Jr., was arrested on or about April 13, 1978 within the corporate city limits of McKinney, Texas by officers of the McKinney Police Department.
III.
(sic)
The motion was filed on July 18, 1978.
On July 21, at a pre-trial hearing, the following occurred
On December 6, 1978, after a jury had been empaneled, the following occurred:
Thus, the record in this case shows that the appellant's attorney recognized and brought to the trial court's attention the potential conflict of interest which existed for him. He did so just four days after receiving the court appointment, and renewed his motion just before trial began. Furthermore, the State joined in the appellant's motion.
The appellant argues that, at the minimum, the trial court should have held a hearing to explore the potential conflict of interest, and determine whether the appellant's counsel could fairly and impartially represent the appellant. We agree.
Canon 5 of the Code of Professional Responsibility (Rules Governing the State Bar of Texas, Article 12, Section 8) states: "A Lawyer Should Exercise Independent Professional Judgment on Behalf of a Client." Among the ethical considerations listed under that canon are:
"EC 5-1. The professional judgment of a lawyer should be exercised, within the bounds of the law, solely for the benefit of his client and free of compromising influences and loyalties. Neither his personal interests, the interests of other clients, nor the desire of third persons should be permitted to dilute his loyalty to his client.
* * *
* * *
Among the disciplinary rules under Canon 5 are:
Canon 9 of the Code of Professional Responsibility states: "A Lawyer Should Avoid Even the Appearance of Professional Impropriety." Among the ethical considerations listed under that canon are:
The American Bar Association's Standards Relating to the Defense Function, Standard 4-3.5(d) provides:
"It is unprofessional conduct for a lawyer to defend a criminal case in which the lawyer's partner or other professional associate is or has been the prosecutor."
The commentary following this standard is instructive:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Garner v. State, 01-92-00073-CR
...the record, and the designation of transcript contains no specific reference to it. 3 Here, unlike in Holloway and Kelly v. State, 640 S.W.2d 605, 607, 611 (Tex.Crim.App.1982), no officer of the court represented to the trial court on the record that a conflict existed. At most, Garner has ......
-
Thompson v. State
...App.1985). When a lawyer admits to a conflict of interest, the court should hold a hearing to explore that conflict. Kelly v. State, 640 S.W.2d 605, 611 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982). If the accused or his counsel make a timely objection and request separate counsel on the basis of a potential confl......
-
Thieleman v. State, No. 13-03-570-CR (Tex. App. 10/26/2006)
...1985). When a lawyer admits to a conflict of interest, the court should hold a hearing to explore that conflict. Kelly v. State, 640 S.W.2d 605, 611 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982). If the accused or his counsel make a timely objection and request separate counsel on the basis of a potential conflic......
-
Moss v. State
...appeal. When a lawyer admits to a conflict of interest, the trial court should hold a hearing to explore that conflict. Kelly v. State, 640 S.W.2d 605, 611 (Tex.Crim.App. 1982). Unfortunately, the trial court did not hold a hearing on trial counsel's alleged conflict of interest. Consequent......