Kelly v. Western Union Tel. Co.
| Decision Date | 24 November 1897 |
| Citation | 43 S.W. 532 |
| Parties | KELLY v. WESTERN UNION TEL. CO.<SMALL><SUP>1</SUP></SMALL> |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from district court, El Paso county; C. N. Buckler, Judge.
Action by Thomas Kelly against the Western Union Telegraph Company. Action dismissed, and plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
W. B. Brack and Millard Patterson, for appellant. Beall & Kemp, for appellee.
This is an action for damages for negligence in the delivery of certain telegrams. The damages alleged consist of five dollars paid as tolls, and of "mental anguish, disappointment, sorrow, and affliction," as the result of the company's violation of its agreements to deliver the messages. The action was brought more than one year after the occurrences charged, but within two years. The court sustained a demurrer on the ground of limitations, and dismissed the action. We are of opinion that the ruling was correct so far as the petition sought to recover damages to the person, and we regard mental anguish, disappointment, sorrow, and affliction as of that class. Thus, as is common in cases of carriers of passengers, there was a contract of carriage from which the company's duty arose; but the wrong complained of was, in substance and in fact, the infliction of injury to the person by negligence. It is immaterial, so far as the question before us is concerned, whether the act or omission from which the injury results violates a duty incident to a contract or not. The statute interposes the bar of one year to damages for injuries done to the person of another, as distinguished from injuries done to the estate or property of another. This is the test. So far, therefore, as the petition seeks damages for injury to the mind or body, it presents a case within the statute of one year. See Martin v. Telegraph Co., 6 Tex. Civ. App. 619, 26 S. W. 136; also Railway Co. v. Roemer, 1 Tex. Civ. App. 191, 20 S. W. 843. But we think it was error to apply this rule to the claim for tolls paid. This pertained to the estate of plaintiff. It appears to be the argument of appellee that, when the damages claimed for mental distress are eliminated from the case, the amount left would not be within the jurisdiction of the court. This view is fallacious. There can be no doubt that the court had jurisdiction to render judgment in respect to all the damages asserted in the petition, and would have proceeded to do so, had the statute of limitations not been appealed to. The case is not that plainti...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Common School District No. 18 v. Twin Falls Bank and Trust Co.
... ... Ill. 619, 82 N.E. 911, 12 Ann. Cas. 175; Union Tool ... Company v. Farmers, etc., Nat. Bank, 192 Cal. 40, 28 A ... L ... 353, 62 ... A. L. R. 1410, 2 S.W.2d 100 ... TEXAS: Kelly v. Western Union Tel. Co., 17 ... Tex. Civ. App. 344, 43 S.W. 532 ... ...
-
Barton v. Woodward
... ... Bryant v. American Surety Co., 69 Minn. 30, 71 N.W ... 826; Kelly v. Western Union Tel. Co., 17 Tex. Civ. 344, 43 ... S.W. 532; 13 Ency ... ...
-
Hansen v. Stoll
...person of another." The courts of Texas have construed this phrase to include mental and emotional distress, Kelly v. Western Union Telegram, 17 Tex.Civ.App. 344, 43 S.W. 532 (1897); Whitley v. Whitley, 436 S.W.2d 607 (Tex.Civ.App.1968), and: In Arizona the gravamen of an action for invasio......
-
Thomas v. Western Union Tel. Co.
...of limitations applicable to a demand based on mental suffering is that applied in cases of personal injuries. Kelly v. Telegraph Co., 17 Tex. Civ. App. 344, 43 S. W. 532. Nevertheless, the cause of action is for damages growing out of a breach of contract. Telegraph Co. v. Coffin, 88 Tex. ......