Kempf v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
Decision Date | 11 March 1916 |
Docket Number | No. 1645.,1645. |
Citation | 184 S.W. 133 |
Parties | KEMPF et al. v. EQUITABLE LIFE ASSUR. SOC. OF UNITED STATES. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Greene County; Guy D. Kirby, Judge.
Action by Hattie E. Kempf and others against the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. From a judgment for the plaintiffs, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
Alexander & Green, of New York City, and Barbour & McDavid, of Springfield, for appellant. W. T. Lamkin, of Billings, Mo., and J. T. Neville and J. T. White, both of Springfield, for respondents.
The plaintiffs (respondents) recovered judgment for $5,000 based on the following petition (formal parts omitted):
The answer filed set up the defense: That the assured committed suicide within one year. That the contract, if any, was a New York contract, pleading the New York laws governing suicide cases. That the policy contained the following provision: That such provision in New York is a legal provision, pleading certain New York decisions on this question. That the acceptance and approval of the application and the issuance of the policy was done by the defendant's agents in New York. This part of the answer, over defendant's exception, was stricken out, and exception preserved.
That part of the answer pertinent to the issue as we see it, and which we deem decisive of the case and the theory on which the case was tried, is as follows (formal parts omitted):
The facts of the case may be stated as follows:
On June 12, 1913, Joseph E. Kempf made an application to the defendant company for $5,000 insurance on the ordinary life plan, on which day he executed a note for $111.25, the same representing the first semiannual premium. On the same day the defendant's agent executed and delivered the following receipt:
The application for insurance, mentioned in the receipt, is the usual form of such documents, being a printed blank with printed questions to be answered and filled in by the applicant. It names the plaintiffs herein as beneficiaries, and contains the following stipulation:
"I hereby agree that the policy issued hereon shall not take effect until the first premium has been paid during my good health."
It also contains the following:
"I have paid to M. A. Nelson $111.25 to cover the first semiannual premium on the policy applied for, in accordance with the provisions of the receipt of date and number corresponding to this application, which I hereby accept, and agree to the conditions thereof."
In the application Kempf stated that he used alcoholic beverages to the extent of from one to two ounces before breakfast.
The local medical examiner pronounced Kempf in good health, stated that he was a first-class risk, and recommended him for life insurance. The forms for the application and the receipt were furnished to the defendant's agent by the defendant company. The application was received by the defendant on June 17, 1913, on which date there was made on defendant's record the notation: Inquiry was made by the defendant, and after the receipt of answers thereto the application shows the following entry thereon in New York: Dr. A. L. Sherill was one of the medical directors of the defendant company at the home office. The following appears under the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Avery v. American Automobile Ins. Co., 38098.
...for applying the rule of strict construction against the insurer is not present in this case. Kempf v. Equitable Life Assn. Soc. of U.S., 184 S.W. 133, reversed on other grounds, 191 S.W. 989; Lemaitre v. National Cas. Co., 195 Mo. App. 599, 186 S.W. 964. (4) The burden of proof was upon de......
-
Bearup v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of U.S.
...v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 35 Mo.App. 54, 67; National City Bank v. Missouri St. L. Ins. Co., 332 Mo. 182, 57 S.W. 2d 1066. He states the Kempf case "was reversed" a different theory in State ex rel. Equitable L. Assur. Soc. v. Robertson (Banc), 191 S.W. 989, 922[4]. The Kempf case involved a lik......
-
Avery v. American Auto. Ins. Co.
... ... Maness v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee, 161 ... Tenn. 41, 28 S.W.2d 339; Gardner v. United Surety ... Co., 110 Minn. 291, 125 N.W. 264; ... this case. Kempf v. Equitable Life Assn. Soc. of ... U.S., 184 ... 151; ... Tommitz v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp., ... 343 Mo. 321, 121 S.W.2d 745; ... 301, ... 188 So. 571; Roche v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty ... Co., 273 N.Y. 473, 6 ... ...
-
Kirby v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
... ... of America, to recover on a policy of life insurance. From an ... adverse judgment, ... L ... R. 149; Cleaver v. Central States Life Insurance ... Company, 346 Mo. 548, 142 ... Mo.App. 969, 27 S.W.2d 49; Block v. United States ... Fidelity & Guaranty Company, 316 Mo ... 488, 108 S.W.2d 17; Kempf v. The Equitable Life Insurance ... Society of ... 1, 59 ... N.E.2d 524; Equitable Life Assur. Soc. v. Pettid, ... Ariz., 11 P.2d 833; ... ...