Kendrick v. Jaeger, A93A2044

Decision Date23 September 1993
Docket NumberNo. A93A2044,A93A2044
Citation436 S.E.2d 92,210 Ga.App. 376
PartiesKENDRICK v. JAEGER et al.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Whitmer & Law, Raymond E. George, Gainesville, for appellant.

Webb, Carlock, Copeland, Semler & Stair, Kent T. Stair, Gregory H. Wheeler, Atlanta, for appellees.

BLACKBURN, Judge.

Appellant James Kendrick d/b/a Town and Country Landscape (Kendrick), filed the underlying action sounding in libel against Dale Jaeger, individually and as agent for Jaeger/Pyburn, Inc. and the Jaeger Company (Jaeger), for statements made by Jaeger to the Gainesville City Council which were subsequently published in The Gainesville Times. The trial court granted Jaeger's motion for summary judgment and this appeal followed.

It is undisputed that in March 1992 Jaeger was a professional landscape designer who was working with the City of Gainesville pursuant to a contract between the city and Jaeger. Jaeger provided design services, bidding assistance, and contract administration relating to irrigation and landscape improvements to the Gainesville Civic Center. Jaeger analyzed the bids presented by eight companies to complete the landscape improvements. With regard to each of the bids, Jaeger evaluated the size of the projects previously performed by each landscaping company, contacted the references provided by each landscape contractor, viewed projects previously completed by each bidder, evaluated the bids in relation to each other, and figured the overall cost of each bid to the city. Thereafter, Jaeger concluded that the project should be awarded to the contractor with the third lowest bid. It is further undisputed that Kendrick submitted the lowest bid. On March 19, 1992 and April 7, 1992, Jaeger presented her opinion to the Gainesville City Council. She displayed slides depicting landscape projects performed by the lowest bidders. On April 7, 1992, the city council voted to award the contract to a contractor other than Kendrick.

Kendrick averred in his complaint that on March 20, 1992, The Gainesville Times published an article containing statements made by Jaeger concerning her evaluation of the bids. Jaeger is quoted as saying, "It's important that we have a good impression." Kendrick further alleges that the article continues with Jaeger stating that she believes the extra expenditure of taxpayer money is worth it, and that her choice for the job could handle the project better than the two lower bidders. In an article published April 3, 1992, Jaeger is quoted as saying that her choice was the "lowest responsible bidder based on its record of completing projects of the magnitude of the civic center and based on their quality of work." Kendrick contends that by these statements "a direct reference is made to [Kendrick], as an entity incapable of handling the project and providing a low quality of work." 1

We have previously determined that "[t]here is no wholesale defamation exemption for anything...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Pospicil v. The Buying Office, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • September 30, 1999
    ...differing opinions is not [defamatory]." Webster v. Wilkins, 217 Ga.App. 194, 195, 456 S.E.2d 699 (1995); Kendrick v. Jaeger, 210 Ga.App. 376, 377, 436 S.E.2d 92 (1993). Reasonable persons could differ on their of another person's personality, and therefore Abuvala's comment does not consti......
  • Chaney v. Harrison & Lynam Llc.Chaney v. Harrison & Lynam
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 25, 2011
    ...of falsity.(Footnote omitted.) Gettner v. Fitzgerald, 297 Ga.App. 258, 261(1)(a), 677 S.E.2d 149 (2009). See also Kendrick v. Jaeger, 210 Ga.App. 376, 377, 436 S.E.2d 92 (1993) (“[T]he expression of opinion on matters with respect to which reasonable men might entertain differing opinions i......
  • Gettner v. Fitzgerald
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 1, 2009
    ...not on the conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas.") (footnotes omitted); Kendrick v. Jaeger, 210 Ga.App. 376, 377, 436 S.E.2d 92 (1993) ("[T]he expression of opinion on matters with respect to which reasonable men might entertain differing opinions is not lib......
  • Webster v. Wilkins
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1995
    ...conscience of judges and juries but on the competition of other ideas." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Kendrick v. Jaeger, 210 Ga.App. 376, 377-378, 436 S.E.2d 92 (1993). Because Wilkins' statement was a wholly subjective opinion not capable of proof or disproof, the statement cannot ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Local Government Law - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 46-1, September 1994
    • Invalid date
    ...reasonable use of force under the circumstances, and that he is entitled to the protection of qualified immunity." Id. at 376, 436 S.E.2d at 92 (footnotes omitted). 113. Id. The court afforded short shrift to yet another Sec. 1983 complaint in Banks v. Mayor of Savannah, 210 Ga. App. 62, 43......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT