Kendrick v. Pippin
| Decision Date | 06 August 2009 |
| Citation | 222 P.3d 380 |
| Docket Number | 08CA1487 |
| Parties | Cheryl A. KENDRICK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Holly L. PIPPIN, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
13 cases
-
Kendrick v. Pippin
...loquitur; and (3) the decision to deny Kendrick's motion for a new trial based on an allegation of juror misconduct. Kendrick v. Pippin, 222 P.3d 380, 383 (Colo.App.2009). The court of appeals affirmed the trial court on all three grounds. Id. at 384–89. Upon review, we reverse the court of......
-
Steward Software Co. v. Kopcho
...Standard of Review We review the trial court's rejection of a tendered jury instruction for an abuse of discretion. Kendrick v. Pippin, 222 P.3d 380, 385 (Colo.App.2009) ( cert. granted in part 2010 WL 60114, Jan. 11, 2010). We will not conclude that the trial court abused its discretion un......
-
Peo v Wiseman
...with respect to the manner in which section 18-1.3-1009 is implemented, then, is against those agencies, and not the People. See Jones, 222 P.3d at 380 (The “defendant’s challenge to his classification as a sex offender must be brought as a civil action against the DOC.”); People v. Jackson......
-
Peo v Havens
...we conclude that the district court did not err when it denied Havens’s Crim. P. 35(c) motion without a hearing. 19See Jones, 222 P.3d at 380 (quoting People v. Heredia, 122 P.3d 1041, 1043 (Colo. App. 2005) (“A trial court loses jurisdiction upon imposition of a valid sentence except under......
Get Started for Free