Kennecott Copper Corporation, a Corp. v. Industrial Commission of Arizona, Civil 4646

Citation149 P.2d 687,61 Ariz. 387
Decision Date14 June 1944
Docket NumberCivil 4646
PartiesKENNECOTT COPPER CORPORATION, a Corporation, Petitioner, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, and RAY GILBERT, FRED E. EDWARDS and EARL G. ROOKS, as Members of the Industrial Commission of Arizona, and JESUS JAIME, Respondents
CourtSupreme Court of Arizona

APPEAL by Certiorari from an Award of The Industrial Commission of Arizona. Award set aside.

Messrs Fennemore, Craig, Allen & Bledsoe, for Petitioner.

Mr. H S. McCluskey and Mr. Fred O. Wilson, for Respondent Industrial Commission.

Messrs Struckmeyer & Struckmeyer, for Respondent Jaime.

OPINION

TRUMAN, Superior Judge.

By stipulation the agreed facts pertaining to the issue involved are as follows:

Jesus Jaime, applicant herein, was employed by defendant, Kennecott Copper Corporation, on or about the 13th day of February, 1942, under contract of employment as leynerman and miner whereby said applicant agreed to perform certain work as a leynerman and miner at the rate of $6.40 per eight hour day and employ such persons as were necessary in the performance of his work, which persons were to be satisfactory to the foreman in charge of the particular area in which said applicant was working and that such applicant was to further receive time and a half for all hours worked in any one week in excess of 40 hours and that in addition thereto the defendant employer Kennecott Copper Corporation agreed to pay said applicant, Jesus Jaime, additional compensation based upon the amount of work completed in any one week. Further under the terms of said contract, a fixed amount of work was to be performed in consideration of the guaranteed wage ($6.40 per 8 hour day with time and a half for all hours of work in any one week in excess of 40 hours), but under no circumstances was he to receive less than such guaranteed wage so long as he remained in the employ of petitioner.

The said applicant began work under the terms of said agreement on February 15, 1942, and that from February 16, 1942, to February 22, 1942, said employee performed other work in and about defendant employer's place of business at the regular miner wage but not under the contract hereinabove referred to. However, from February 22, 1942, until the time of applicant's injury on March 13, 1942, he worked under the terms of said contract and on the 13th day of March 1942, the applicant received permanent injuries as a result of a blast from a missed hole in the course of his employment. That during said course of employment said applicant not only worked several over-time shifts but in addition thereto received under the terms of his agreement additional monies in the sum of $32.84 based upon the excess over and above the minimum work completed under his contract. That the average monthly wage of such an employee at the regular rate plus over-time amounted to the sum of $179.20. The Commission after a rehearing made an award to the applicant on the basis of such $163.20 plus $32.84. From this award the petitioner appeals on the grounds that it is not conformative to the expressed statutory provision of Section 56-952, Arizona Code Annotated,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Fletcher v. Industrial Commission
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • 15 Agosto 1978
    ...113 (1945), Overruled on other grounds, Sanchez v. Industrial Comm'n, 96 Ariz. 19, 391 P.2d 579 (1964); Kennecott Copper Corp. v. Industrial Comm'n, 61 Ariz. 387, 149 P.2d 687 (1944). We must agree with respondent that this case is governed by the decision in Marum where, as here, all emplo......
  • Wells v. Industrial Commission of Arizona
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 14 Julio 1945
    ... ... HENSLEY, Defendant Employer, Respondents Civil No. 4824Supreme Court of ArizonaJuly 14, 1945 ... applying the rule announced in Kennecott Copper ... Corp. v. Industrial Comm., 61 Ariz ... ...
  • Barron v. Ambort
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 8 Abril 1946
    ...is that the award must be affirmed unless we shall disaffirm or distinguish the Kennecott-Jaime case, supra. While it is our view that the Kennecott decision has no to the situation here, this is not to be taken as a criticism of the commission's reliance thereon. The language of the court,......
  • Miami Copper Co. v. Schoonover, 4925
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • 24 Marzo 1947
    ...state of facts. Secondly, the Commission says that there are some new factors introduced into this case that were not involved in either the Jaime case, or the Barron case, supra, i. e. that Federal Government has occupied the field in this matter, and that the overriding Federal legislatio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT