Kennedy v. Wheeler
Decision Date | 10 October 1923 |
Docket Number | (No. 6745.) |
Citation | 256 S.W. 315 |
Parties | KENNEDY v. WHEELER. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, McLennan County; H. M. Richey, Judge.
Action between Con T. Kennedy and L. O. Wheeler. From the judgment rendered Con T. Kennedy appeals. On motion to dismiss appeal. Motion overruled.
Spell, Naman & Penland, of Waco, for appellant.
Weatherby & Rogers, of Waco, for appellee.
Statement.
This case is appealed from McLennan county. This county was formerly in the Third supreme judicial district of Texas, but, by an Act of the Thirty-Eighth Legislature, at its Regular Session (chapter 74) was placed in the newly created Tenth supreme judicial district. Appeal bond was filed in the court below on April 16, 1923. The act of the Legislature creating the Tenth supreme judicial district became effective June 12, 1923. This act did not provide for a transfer of any cases to the new court. On June 27, 1923, the Supreme Court of Texas issued the following order:
On the 10th or 11th of July, in a long distance telephone conversation, the attorney for appellant was advised by a member of this court, and also by the clerk of this court, not to send the record in this case to the clerk of this court, but to file the same with the clerk of the Tenth Court of Civil Appeals. This he did on July 12th. Thereafter, on August 18th, appellant withdrew the record from the Tenth Court of Civil Appeals, and sent same to the clerk of this court, with a request that it be filed as of July 12th, the day on which he had tendered it to the clerk by telephone, and was then advised by the clerk that he would refuse to file it if tendered to him in person. It bears file mark of this court, dated July 12, 1923.
Appellee, by motion, urges that this is the proper court in which to dispose of said appeal; asks that the transcript and statement of facts be stricken out...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kennedy v. Wheeler
...Judge. Action by L. O. Wheeler against Con T. Kennedy. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded. See, also, 256 S. W. 315. Spell, Naman & Penland and J. W. Cocke, all of Waco, for Weatherby & Rogers, of Waco, for appellee. SPIVEY, J. Appellee brought this suit ag......
-
Walker v. Lyles
...before the present amendment, and therefore are not applicable here. Rwy. v. Waggoner, 102 Tex. 260, 115 S. W. 1172; Kennedy v. Wheeler (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. W. 315; and other cases. This appeal would fall within the amended article because the application for extension was not made "with......
-
State v. Wright
...matter of the suit. Articles 2253 and 2267, R. S. 1925; Gordon v. Rhodes & Daniels (Tex. Civ. App.) 104 S. W. 786; Kennedy v. Wheeler (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. W. 315; Moore v. McLennan County (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. 478; 3 Tex. Jur. p. 284, § 189; p. 367, § The rule as stated in 3 Tex. Ju......
-
Fry v. Barron
...Latimer v. Ry. (Tex. Civ. App.) 104 S. W. 788; Waterman Lumber & Supply Co. v. Wheeler (Tex. Civ. App.) 142 S. W. 145; Kennedy v. Wheeler (Tex. Civ. App.) 256 S. W. 315; Moore v. McLennan County (Tex. Civ. App.) 275 S. W. "The Redistricting Act above mentioned of the Fortieth Legislature ma......