Kenny v. Bacolo
Decision Date | 20 December 1983 |
Citation | 61 N.Y.2d 642,460 N.E.2d 219,472 N.Y.S.2d 78 |
Parties | , 460 N.E.2d 219 Henry KENNY et al., Plaintiffs, v. James BACOLO et al., Defendants, and Martin L. Horowitz, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Atlantic Repair Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 88 A.D.2d 904, 450 N.Y.S.2d 774, should be affirmed, with costs. The question certified is not answered, as unnecessary.
The Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act provides that an employer's obligation to compensate an employee under the act "shall be exclusive and in place of all other liability of such employer to the employee * * * and anyone otherwise entitled to recover damages from such employer at law * * * on account of such injury" to the employee (U.S.Code, tit. 33, § 905, subd. [a] ). Plaintiff, an employee of the third-party defendant, Atlantic Repair Co., Inc., received an award of compensation on January 12, 1981, pursuant to a compensation order under the act (see U.S.Code, tit. 33, § 919) obligating Atlantic and the State Insurance Fund to provide certain payments to plaintiff. This compensation order precludes defendant Horowitz from maintaining this third-party action for contribution against plaintiff's employer (see Cooper Stevedoring Co. v. Kopke, Inc., 417 U.S. 106, 94 S.Ct. 2174, 40 L.Ed.2d 694; Atlantic Coast Line R.R. Co. v. Erie Lackawanna R.R. Co., 406 U.S. 340, 92 S.Ct. 1550, 32 L.Ed.2d 110; Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Corp., 342 U.S. 282, 72 S.Ct. 277, 96 L.Ed. 318; U.S.Code, tit. 33, § 905, subd. [a] ).
Defendant claims that there is no bar to his third-party claim for contribution. He argues that he may not be bound by the Federal award because he was afforded no notice of or opportunity to appear at the administrative proceeding. Defendant further contends that the award was improperly made because the provisions of the act are inapplicable to plaintiff's injuries as they did not occur in circumstances covered by the act (see U.S.Code, tit. 33, § 903, subd. [a] ).
It is true that the principle of collateral estoppel does not apply here to bar the claim because defendant was not a party or in privity with a party to the proceeding before the Federal agency. In addition, the record does not indicate that he had a fair and full opportunity to litigate the issue before the agency because he had no notice of the proceeding (see S.T. Grand, Inc. v. City of New York, 32 N.Y.2d 300, 304, 344 N.Y.S.2d 938, 298 N.E.2d 105). Defendant, however, may not properly controvert the award in a State court. The exclusive means for setting aside Federal compensation orders is by way of an administrative or judicial proceeding in a Federal forum pursuant to the provisions of the act (see Dantes v. Western Foundation Corp. Assn., 614 F.2d 299, 300 (1st Cir.1980); U.S.Code, tit. 33, § 921, subds. [c], [e] ). * Thus, Atlantic's motion to dismiss the third-party complaint was properly granted.
It was also proper to dismiss the third-party complaint as to Bacolo and Decker Tank & Equipment Company. As plaintiff's coemployee, Bacolo is immune from any suit for contribution based upon injuries he may have caused to plaintiff (see Dingler v. Halcyon Lijn N.V., 305 F.Supp. 1, 2 [citing U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News, 1959, 86th Cong., 1st...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Isabella v. Koubek
... ... 's Compensation Law would, thereby, be thwarted.4 N.Y.2d at 591, 176 N.Y.S.2d 622, 152 N.E.2d 59.In a subsequent New York Court of Appeals case, Kenny v. Bacolo, 61 N.Y.2d 642, 472 N.Y.S.2d 78, 460 N.E.2d 219 (1983), the driver negligently drove a truck owned by the defendant, thereby causing the ... ...
-
Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.
... ... Jones, 4 N.Y.2d 592, 176 N.Y.S.2d 628, 152 N.E.2d 63; Compensation--Co-Employee's Liability, Ann., 21 A.L.R.3d 845, 868-871; see also, Kenny v. Bacolo, 61 N.Y.2d 642, 472 N.Y.S.2d 78, 460 N.E.2d 219). The court reasoned that O'Rourke v. Long, 41 N.Y.2d 219, 391 N.Y.S.2d 553, 359 N.E.2d ... ...
-
Pennisi v. Standard Fruit & S.S. Co.
... ... § 1333; Triguero v. Consol. Rail Corp., supra; Kenny v. Bacolo, 61 N.Y.2d 642, 472 N.Y.S.2d 78, 460 N.E.2d 219; Agnese v. Taylor Mach. Works, 171 A.D.2d 831, 567 N.Y.S.2d 766) ... ...
-
Isabella v. Hallock
... ... But we extended the reach of Rauch and Naso to third-party claims in an analogous context in Kenny v. Bacolo, 61 N.Y.2d 642, 472 N.Y.S.2d 78, 460 N.E.2d 219 (1983). There, the plaintiff sustained injuries in an automobile accident and sued the ... ...