Keohane v. Jones

Citation328 F.Supp.3d 1288
Decision Date22 August 2018
Docket NumberCase No. 4:16cv511-MW/CAS
Parties Reiyn KEOHANE, Plaintiff, v. Julie JONES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Florida Department of Corrections, Defendant.
CourtU.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida

Daniel Boaz Tilley, Nancy Gbana Abudu, ACLU Foundation of Florida Inc., Miami, FL, Leslie Jill Cooper, American Civil Liberties Union, New York, NY, Elizabeth C. Akins, DLA Piper LLP, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiff.

Daniel Ryan Russell, Marc Wesley Dunbar, William Dean Hall, III, Jones Walker LLP, Tallahassee, FL, Allison B. Kingsmill, Jones Walker LLP, New Orleans, LA, Kirkland Edward Reid, Jones Walker LLP, Mobile, AL, for Defendant.

ORDER ON THE MERITS

Mark E. Walker, Chief United States District Judge

"The basic concept underlying the Eighth Amendment is nothing less than the dignity of man." Trop v. Dulles , 356 U.S. 86, 100, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958).

This case involves an individual immersed in the process of transitioning gender roles when she1 found herself in jail after a violent argument with her roommate. Reiyn Keohane was born anatomically male, but she began identifying as female around age eight. She says she's always had an "internal sense" of being female.2 Since age fourteen, Ms. Keohane has worn women's clothing, makeup, and hair styles, adopted a feminine name, and used female pronouns at school and with family and friends. In short, she's lived as a woman in all aspects of her life since her early teens.

Ms. Keohane was formally diagnosed with gender dysphoria at age sixteen, and as soon as she was permitted—and it was safe to do so—she began a hormone therapy regimen to ease her dysphoria and feminize her body. But shortly thereafter, she was arrested and cut off from the treatment she needed, including hormone therapy and the ability to dress and groom as a woman.

Ms. Keohane continuously grieved her denial of care during the first two years in Defendant's custody, but she faced roadblocks every step of the way.3 At times, her untreated dysphoria caused such extreme anxiety that she says she's attempted to kill herself and to castrate herself to rid her body of its testosterone source.

Ms. Keohane's testimony at trial demonstrates the lengths to which she'll go to feel better in her own skin. On one occasion, she said she tied a rubber band around her scrotum to reduce circulation and cut down the center line in a place she estimated would lessen the chance of excessive blood loss. After breaking the skin, she said she tried to squeeze one of her testicles out of her body in what she perceived to be an attempt at self-castration, but her hands were shaking so badly from the pain that she couldn't finish the job.4 No matter though for Defendant. Even this deafening call for help didn't cause a reevaluation in the way it was treating Ms. Keohane.

It wasn't until Ms. Keohane found a lawyer willing to take her case that things changed for the better. Defendant was staring down the barrel of a federal lawsuit when it suddenly changed course by securing hormone therapy and amending its policy formerly prohibiting new treatment for inmates with gender dysphoria—all within a matter of months after Ms. Keohane filed her complaint.

This case has been a moving target from the beginning, morphing with Defendant's shifting explanations for the denial of hormone treatment and access to female clothing and grooming standards. But the essential issues before this Court can be distilled down to these; namely, was Defendant deliberately indifferent to Ms. Keohane's gender dysphoria—which both sides agree is a serious medical need—when it denied her hormone therapy for two years? Should this Court enter an injunction ordering Defendant to provide the requested treatment? Part and parcel to this second inquiry is whether Defendant's provision of hormone therapy and amendment to its policies has sufficiently remedied Ms. Keohane's injuries. And lastly, is the parallel treatment for gender dysphoria—namely, social transitioning through access to Defendant's female clothing and grooming standards—necessary to treat Ms. Keohane's gender dysphoria such that Defendant's refusal to provide treatment amounts to deliberate indifference?

When it comes to medical care in prison, reasonable minds may differ. One can be negligent, even grossly negligent, when treating an inmate without offending the United States Constitution. Farrow v. West , 320 F.3d 1235, 1243 (11th Cir. 2003). But while the standard for establishing deliberate indifference is high, it is not impossible to meet. And if Ms. Keohane's treatment in Defendant's custody isn't deliberate indifference, then surely there is no such beast. Ultimately, this case is about whether the law, and this Court by extension, recognizes Ms. Keohane's humanity as a transgender woman. The answer is simple. It does, and I do.

I

Ms. Keohane is a transgender woman. Her assigned sex at birth was male—she was born with and still has male genitalia—but she identifies as a woman. ECF No. 133 at ¶¶ F. 5, 19. When she was fourteen years old, Ms. Keohane told her parents about her gender identity. ECF No. 145 at 24. Thereafter until her incarceration at age nineteen, Ms. Keohane wore girls' or women's clothing and makeup, and grew her hair to a longer, traditionally feminine length. Id. at 25. She adopted a feminine name—Jamie—and preferred using female pronouns. Id. Later, Ms. Keohane legally changed her first name to Reiyn "to bring [it] into conformity with [her] gender identity." ECF No. 3-1 at ¶ 6. And at age sixteen, Ms. Keohane was formally diagnosed with gender identity disorder—now known as gender dysphoria. ECF No. 133 at ¶ F. 8, 9.

A

Gender dysphoria generally "refers to discomfort or distress that is caused by a discrepancy between a person's gender identity and that person's sex assigned at birth." ECF No. 3-16 at 4. It is a psychiatric diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders published by the American Psychiatric Association, and manifests as "a set of symptoms that include anxiety, irritability, depression, and this sense of incongruence or mismatch between one's sex of assignment at birth and internally felt[ ] gender identity." ECF No. 145 at 144.

Ms. Keohane's expert at trial, Dr. George R. Brown, identified three criteria for a gender dysphoria diagnosis. First, a patient must have "experienced a significant incongruity between their sex of assignment at birth, their anatomy, and their internal sense of their gender for a minimum of six months." Id. at 145. Second, a patient must meet a combination of several specific criteria such as "having a strong disgust or repulsion of one's own genitals, a desire to be rid of those genitals, [or] a desire to have treatment to approximate the other gender." Id. The third requirement considers whether the first two criteria are "distressing enough or ... cause enough dysfunction in your life and important areas of your functioning that they are clinically relevant."Id. at 146. "[I]t's important that people have a level of distress ... or dysfunction ... otherwise the diagnosis is not legitimate." Id.

In short, transgender people may feel some dysphoria, or anxiety, about their bodies and their gender identity. But not all transgender people are formally diagnosed with gender dysphoria—indeed, this Court recognizes that many transgender people may be perfectly at ease and even rejoice in their own skin. A formal diagnosis of gender dysphoria results only if a person's symptoms of dysphoria are severe enough and persist for so long that they become "clinically relevant." ECF No. 145 at 146. Pursuant to their pretrial stipulation, the parties agree and this Court finds that Ms. Keohane has been diagnosed, and is currently diagnosed, with gender dysphoria—a serious medical need. ECF No. 133 at ¶¶ F. 6-7.

B

At trial, this Court heard testimony about established standards of care for treating gender dysphoria, including those published by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health ("WPATH"), "an international, multidisciplinary, professional association whose mission is to promote evidence-based care, education, research, advocacy, public policy, and respect in transsexual and transgender health." ECF No. 3-16 at 2. WPATH has published standards of care ("WPATH Standards") for treating gender dysphoria in its "Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7." See generally id. These standards are "intended for worldwide use," id. at 3, and are recognized by the American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Psychological Association, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ECF No. 145 at 157. Accordingly, this Court finds the WPATH Standards authoritative in the treatment of gender dysphoria.

The WPATH Standards "are intended to be flexible in order to meet the diverse health care needs of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people." ECF No. 3-16 at 2. They confirm that treatment requires an individualized approach. "The number and type of interventions applied and the order in which these take place may differ from person to person." Id. at 7. Defendant's own expert, Dr. Stephen Levine, generally agrees with this approach, opining at trial that determining the proper treatment for a person with gender dysphoria should be a deliberate and thoughtful process. ECF No. 146 at 90.

Dr. Brown explained at trial that several treatment options can alleviate a person's gender dysphoria. They primarily include psychotherapy, "hormonal management," and "surgical interventions ... like genital confirmation surgery or sex reassignment surgery." Id. at 146-47. And aside from these "three main domains," social transitioning is another option for treating gender dysphoria. ECF No. 145 at 147.

Social transitioning can include "changing...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • August 23, 2019
    ...1111 (D. Idaho 2018). Most courts agree. See, e.g. , De’lonta v. Johnson , 708 F.3d 520, 522–23 (4th Cir. 2013) ; Keohane v. Jones , 328 F. Supp. 3d 1288, 1294 (N.D. Fla. 2018), appeal filed , No. 18-14096 (11th Cir. 2018); Norsworthy v. Beard , 87 F. Supp. 3d 1164, 1170 (N.D. Cal.), appeal......
  • Keohane v. Fla. Dep't of Corr. Sec'y
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eleventh Circuit
    • March 11, 2020
    ...FDC to permit Keohane "to socially transition by allowing her access to female clothing and grooming standards." Keohane v. Jones , 328 F. Supp. 3d 1288, 1319 (N.D. Fla. 2018).We hold that Keohane's challenges to the prior freeze-frame policy and the FDC's initial denial of hormone therapy ......
  • Grimm v. Gloucester Cnty. Sch. Bd.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • August 26, 2020
    ...of care, see De'lonta v. Johnson , 708 F.3d 520, 522–23 (4th Cir. 2013) ; see also Edmo , 935 F.3d at 769 ; Keohane v. Jones , 328 F. Supp. 3d 1288, 1294 (N.D. Fla. 2018), vacated sub nom. Keohane v. Fla. Dep't of Corrs. Sec'y , 952 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2020).2 "There are no other competing......
  • Dokes v. LTD Fin. Servs., L.P.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Alabama
    • September 13, 2018
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • LIVING FREELY BEHIND BARS: REFRAMING THE DUE PROCESS RIGHTS OF TRANSGENDER PRISONERS.
    • United States
    • Columbia Journal of Gender and Law Vol. 40 No. 3, June 2021
    • June 22, 2021
    ...Hierarchy: Transgender Prisoners, Rape, and the Eighth Amendment, 44 SANTA CLARA L. REV. 1211, 1220(2004). (34) Keohane v. Jones, 328 F. Supp. 3d 1288, 1292 (N.D. Fla. (35) Agbemenu, supra note 17, at 2. (36) Peek, supra note 33, at 1220, 1239-40. (37) According to a 2015 report by the U.S.......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT