Kern v. Gebhardt, 84CA1106
Decision Date | 26 December 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 84CA1106,84CA1106 |
Citation | 717 P.2d 998 |
Parties | George B. KERN and Richard P. Hume, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Richard G. GEBHARDT, Public Trustee of the County of Boulder, State of Colorado, Defendant-Appellee. . I |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Robinson & Mallon, P.C., James C. Mallon, Susan A. Stearns, Evergreen, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Hutchinson, Black, Hill, Buchanan & Cook Heather Ryan, Boulder, for defendant-appellee.
In this appeal from a declaratory judgment, the sole question for resolution is whether the trial court erred in ruling that § 38-38-106, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16A) limits the amount of attorneys' fees which may be assessed in a public trustee foreclosure of an accelerated debt to 10% of the sum for which the property is being foreclosed. We conclude that the attorneys' fees were properly so limited and, therefore, affirm.
The facts giving rise to this controversy are undisputed. The plaintiffs, George B. Kern and Richard P. Hume, commenced foreclosure on a deed of trust which secured a promissory note to the plaintiffs pursuant to provisions in the note and deed of trust permitting acceleration of the entire debt upon a default by the debtor.
Prior to the scheduled sale date, the public trustee declared that the amount which the plaintiffs proposed to bid at the sale was unacceptable under § 38-38-106, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16A) because it included attorneys' fees of more than 10% of the amount being foreclosed. The public trustee agreed, however, to allow the total bid at the sale, provided that, in the event of a redemption of the property by the debtor, the disputed portion of the attorneys' fees would be escrowed pending a court order determining the applicability of the statute.
The plaintiffs subsequently sought declaratory relief in the district court and an order releasing the money held in escrow. The trial court granted the defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. In its extensive minute order, the trial court ruled that it was bound by the opinion of this court in Rowe v. Tucker, 38 Colo.App. 532, 560 P.2d 843 (1977) holding that the statutory limitation on attorneys' fees applies to foreclosures for the full amount of the indebtedness. The trial court rejected Jacobs Investments v. PRD Holdings, Ltd., 44 Colo.App. 184, 612 P.2d 1149 (1980) as not dispositive.
The plaintiffs aver that § 38-38-106, C.R.S. (1982 Repl.Vol. 16A) is limited solely to an award of attorneys' fees for foreclosure based on default in one or more installments and that, if the foreclosure is for the whole amount of the accelerated indebtedness, reasonable attorneys' fees not subject to the 10% limitation should be awarded. They cite Jacobs Investments v. PRD Holdings, Ltd., supra, in support of this proposition.
The public trustee, on the other hand, argues that the statute encompasses both types of foreclosure and relies on Rowe v. Tucker, supra. We agree with the public trustee.
Section 38-38-106 is one of several statutory sections dealing with foreclosure of mortgages and trust deeds based on past due installments. This section states:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kern v. Gebhardt
...the right to declare the whole of the indebtedness due and payable on default of any part of the obligation. In Kern v. Gebhardt, 717 P.2d 998 (Colo.App.1985), the court of appeals held that the ten percent limitation on attorney fees was applicable to such a proceeding. We now affirm the T......
-
San Miguel Basin State Bank v. Oliver, 85CA1482
...Vol. 16A). This provision applies whether a single installment is delinquent or whether the entire debt is accelerated. Kern v. Gebhardt, 717 P.2d 998 (Colo.App.1985). The trial court granted the Bank's claim for attorney fees of $38,970 on a bid of $336,887.24. The Bank had asserted that $......
-
1987 Statutory Amendments Concerning Foreclosures of Deeds of Trust and Mortgages
...Using In-House Counsel," 15 The Colorado Lawyer 1063 (June 1986). 3. Rowe v. Tucker, 560 P.2d 843 (Colo. App. 1977); Kern v. Gebhardt, 717 P.2d 998 (Colo.App. 1985). 4. CRS § 38-37-143. This newsletter is prepared by the Real Estate Law and Titles Section of the Colorado Bar Association to ......