Kern v. Kern
| Decision Date | 22 February 1974 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 73--361,73--362,s. 73--361 |
| Citation | 291 So.2d 210 |
| Parties | John T. KERN, Appellant, v. Jack D. KERN, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Ronald E. Jones, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Richard B. Burk, of Scott, Burk & Royce, Palm Beach, for appellee.
This is an appeal by Joan T. Kern, respondent, from an order denying her motion to set aside default and final judgment entered pursuant thereto in favor of Jack D. Kern, petitioner.
The respondent's motion to set aside default and final judgment was filed pursuant to Rule 1.540(b), FRCP, 31 F.S.A., and was predicated upon 'misrepresentations' and 'fraudulent misrepresentations' made by the petitioner upon which respondent relied and which misrepresentations resulted in respondent's failure to file a responsive pleading in a divorce action between the parties thereby allowing the default and final judgment to be entered against her.
Rule 1.540(b) provides, in part:
'On motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, decree, order or proceeding for the following reasons: . . . (3) fraud (whether heretofore denominated intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation or other misconduct of an adverse party; . . .'
The policy of the courts of Florida in setting aside defaults in order to permit a trial on the merits is one of liberality; a greater leniency is granted in those cases not decided on the merits. Imperial Industries, Inc. v. Moore Pipe & Sprinkler Co., Fla.App.1972, 261 So.2d 540; Florida Investment Enterprises, Inc. v. Kentucky Co., Fla.App.1964, 160 So.2d 733; 19 Fla.Jur., Judgments and Decrees, Sec. 457. Reviewing the evidence in the record in light of the foregoing principle and with due regard to the proposition that a motion to vacate is addressed to the discretion of the trial court, we are of the opinion that the motion to vacate should have been granted. See North Shore Hospital, Inc. v. Barber, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 849; Gordon v. Vaughan, Fla.App.1967, 193 So.2d 474; Coggin v. Barfield, 1942, 150 Fla. 551, 8 So.2d 9. There was sufficient evidence to demonstrate misrepresentation by the petitioner with particular regard to the matter of child custody so as to afford respondent a trial on the merits with respect to that issue and with regard to the other matters contained in a separation agreement previously entered into by the parties prior to the dissolution of their...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Tenneboe v. Tenneboe
...v. Moss, 334 So.2d 89 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976) (overreaching); Demaggio v. Demaggio, 317 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975) (fraud); Kern v. Kern, 291 So.2d 210 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 294 So.2d 657 (Fla.1974) (misrepresentation). See also Lanes v. Lanes, 454 So.2d 782 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) ("mista......
-
Kern v. Kern
...judgment granting the dissolution and awarding him custody of the minor children. This order was reversed on appeal. Kern v. Kern, 291 So.2d 210 (Fla.App.4th 1974), Cert. denied, 294 So.2d 657 (Fla.1974). However, the minor children have continued to live with their father. On remand the tr......
-
Kern v. Kern, 74--1167
...rights of visitation to the wife. The wife filed timely appeal and the decision of the circuit court was reversed in Kern v. Kern, Fla.App.4th, 1974, 291 So.2d 210, cert. den. 294 So.2d Upon the case being remanded to the Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, the wife, through her attorney, f......
-
Kern v. Kern, s. 75--1
...the parties' six children to the husband with rights of reasonable visitation to the wife. On appeal this was reversed in Kern v. Kern, Fla.App.4th 1974, 291 So.2d 210, cert. den. Fla., 294 So.2d (2) Upon remand, the trial court in Palm Beach County granted the wife's motion for a change of......