Kerr v. Kerr, 85-1270
| Decision Date | 17 April 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 85-1270,85-1270 |
| Citation | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 909,486 So.2d 708 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | 11 Fla. L. Weekly 909 In re the Marriage of Lyndell Kevin KERR, Appellant, v. Debra Ann KERR, Appellee. |
Devo A. Heller of Brinson, Smith, Heller & Smith, P.A., Kissimmee, for appellant.
Debra Ann Kerr, pro se.
This is an appeal from a judgment in a marriage dissolution case. The only point on appeal is the denial of the father's right to have overnight visitation with his two-year old son. The trial judge ruled "(t)he husband shall not have overnight visitation with the child due to the tender years until further order of this Court."
We assume the trial judge was applying the "tender years doctrine" which has been effectively abolished in Florida by section 61.13(2)(b)(1), Florida Statutes (1983) which provides:
Custody and Support of Children; Visitation Rights; Power of Court in Making Orders.
... It is the public policy of this state to assure each minor child frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage and to encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing. Upon considering all relevant factors, the father of the child shall be given the same consideration as the mother in determining custody without regard to the age of the child.
There was no evidence in the record that the father was unable to care for his child overnight and he was certainly willing to do so. It was error to deny the father and the child their visitation.
The judgment is affirmed in all respects except the denial of the overnight visitation.
AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Adamson v. Chavis
...courts also have rejected the use of the tender years doctrine in determining visitation rights. The trial court in Kerr v. Kerr, 486 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), had refused overnight visitation of a child with his father because of the child's youth. The Fifth District reversed and stat......
-
Ketola v. Ketola, 93-4024
...the most substantial change included in this legislation." Accordingly, we agree with the Fifth District's decision in Kerr v. Kerr, 486 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), that subsection 61.13(2)(b)1, Florida Statutes (1983), effectively abolished the "tender years doctrine" in Florida. Accord......
-
Kuutti v. Kuutti
...awarding custody to the mother when the child is young. In DeCamp, we rejected the conclusion of the Fifth District, in Kerr v. Kerr, 486 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), that section 61.13(2)(b)1 had abolished the tender years doctrine, determining instead that the "equal rights provision" o......
-
Johnson v. Adair, 2D03-5452.
...See Cherradi v. LaVoie, 662 So.2d 751 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Ketola v. Ketola, 636 So.2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Kerr v. Kerr, 486 So.2d 708 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986). The "tender years" doctrine gives a preference to the mother of a child of tender years in matters of custody determination. Under......