Key v. Carolina & N.W. Ry. Co.
Decision Date | 05 April 1929 |
Docket Number | 12633. |
Citation | 147 S.E. 625,150 S.C. 29 |
Parties | KEY v. CAROLINA & N.W. RY. CO. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Chester County; John S Wilson, Judge.
Action by F. J. Key against the Carolina & Northwestern Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Reversed and remanded for new trial.
Frank G. Tompkins, of Columbia, John A. Marion, of York, and Glenn & MacAulay, of Chester, for appellant.
Hemphill & Hemphill and Gaston, Hamilton & Gaston, all of Chester, for respondent.
This is an action for punitive damages, growing out of injuries received by the respondent in a collision of an automobile in which the respondent was riding, and a train of the defendant at a grade crossing in Chester county. In the trial before his honor, Judge John S. Wilson, the jury rendered a verdict in favor of the respondent for both actual and punitive damages. Defendant has appealed to this court on 27 exceptions.
The fourth defense of the answer of the defendant contained the following allegations:
In support of the allegations of the answer set forth, the defendant offered some testimony. Under the view we take of the case, it is not necessary, or proper, to attempt to state that testimony, or the testimony introduced by the plaintiff to refute those allegations of the answer. To properly consider the appeal, it is only incumbent upon us to ascertain if there was any testimony favorable to the defendant on the issue made as to the defense set up by it.
Based upon the allegations of the answer referred to, and the testimony offered by the defendant in support thereof, the defendant requested the circuit judge to charge the jury as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial- Key v. Carolina & N.W. Ry. Co.
-
Ford v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
...the case of B. & O. R. Co. v. Goodman, 275 U.S. 66, 48 S.Ct. 24, 72 L.Ed. 167, 56 A. L. R. 645, is denied in South Carolina. Key v. Car. & N.W. R. Co., 150 S.C. 29, 147 S.E. 625; Holladay A. C. L. R. Co., 150 S.C. 243, 147 S.E. 927. "6. Although holding that the failure to give the signals ......
-
Conn v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.
... 159 S.E. 331 201 N.C. 157, 77 A.L.R. 641 CONN v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RY. CO. et al. No. 107. Supreme Court of North Carolina June 27, 1931 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, Vance County; Sinclair, Judge ... Action ... by Lonnie G ... ...
-
Carter v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
... ... This construction is ... sustained by the decision of the Court [192 S.C. 447] in ... Neely, Adm'r v. Carolina & N. W. Ry. Co., 123 S.C ... 449, 117 S.E. 55, which merely gives effect to the plain ... language of the statute ... One of ... ...