Keyes Farm & Dairy Co. v. Prindle
Decision Date | 08 April 1913 |
Citation | 155 S.W. 391,249 Mo. 600 |
Parties | KEYES FARM & DAIRY COMPANY, Appellant, v. E. M. PRINDLE |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. -- Hon. William M. Kinsey Judge.
Affirmed.
Bernard Greensfelder for appellant.
Lyon & Swarts and Dwight D. Currie for respondent.
This is an appeal from a judgment for defendant in an action for damages for defendant's refusal to ship to plaintiff the milk produced by him at his dairy in Green county, Illinois the petition alleging that under the contract herein-after set out defendant was obligated to deliver plaintiff his entire product. Defendant concedes the contract bound him to ship plaintiff certified milk and cream in quantities sufficient to meet the requirements of the customers plaintiff had secured for those particular commodities, but avers other shipments were to be made at his option. Defendant offered to continue to perform the contract according to his construction of it, but this did not satisfy plaintiff and this suit followed.
During the two years prior to the execution of the contract in question defendant shipped milk and cream to plaintiff, a corporation engaged in selling dairy products to consumers in St. Louis. Meanwhile the St. Louis Pure Milk Commission (hereafter referred to as the Commission) had been established, had adopted and registered as a trade-mark the words "Certified Milk" and had prescribed numerous regulations to be observed by dairies in producing and marketing milk as a condition precedent to granting them permission to sell milk in St. Louis as "certified milk." In addition to the requirements as to sanitation, the exclusion of tuberculous animals from the herd, etc., "certified milk" was required to be bottled at the dairy and the bottles packed in ice. Accompanying each bottle was a certificate in the form of a printed slip furnished by the Commission, which only those dairies complying with the Commission's regulations were authorized to use. Milk thus certified sold in St. Louis for fifteen cents per quart.
In the spring of 1906 the manager of plaintiff company conceived the idea of attempting to build up a certified milk business, plaintiff not then receiving any milk of that character though marketing large quantities of uncertified milk, cream, etc. To accomplish this purpose plaintiff took up the matter with defendant and these negotiations resulted in the execution, in March, 1906, of the contract for the alleged breach of which this action was brought. The essential parts of the contract are:
To continue reading
Request your trial