Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., s. 79-109

Decision Date13 November 1979
Docket NumberNos. 79-109,79-270,s. 79-109
Citation376 So.2d 919
PartiesRonald J. KIAER, Appellant, v. FRIENDSHIP, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Malcolm C. Berman, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Bradford, Williams, McKay, Kimbrell, Hamann, Jennings & Kniskern and Michael K. McLemore, Miami, for appellant.

A. P. Walter, Jr., Miami, for appellees.

Before HENDRY, HUBBART and NESBITT, JJ.

HENDRY, Judge.

The crux of this consolidated appeal concerns the propriety of the trial court's having entered a default judgment against appellant/defendant, where appellant had had no notice and had earlier filed a responsive pleading in the cause. We reverse.

The suit filed by appellees seeking compensatory and punitive damages was based on allegations that appellant had failed to deliver good title to a yacht which he sold to appellees due to a prior outstanding boatyard bill of over $7,000.00. After two amended complaints were filed by appellees, Kiaer timely filed an answer and set forth several affirmative defenses including, Inter alia, that the buyer had knowledge of the lien at the time the purchase contract was entered into; that the buyer had reason to know that appellant-seller was purporting to sell only such right or title to the vessel as he possessed; that the buyer failed to notify the seller within a reasonable time after the buyer's discovery of the alleged breach of the warranty of title. The cause proceeded through discovery, trial dates were set and continuances granted both parties; ultimately, trial was set for the week of December 11, 1978. However, appellant's counsel filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and hearing was had in September, after which the court entered its order granting the withdrawal motion. The record reflects that appellant failed to appear at the non-jury trial scheduled for December 11, 1978, and based on his failure to appear personally and/or have legal representation, the trial court entered its order of final judgment awarding compensatory and punitive damages, as well as costs and expenses to Friendship, Inc. and Malcolm C. Berman. Thereafter in January of 1979, appellant, through present counsel, filed a motion to vacate the default judgment and/or for relief from judgment; the motion was accompanied by two supporting affidavits signed by appellant. The major assertions contained in the affidavits were:

"That prior to December 1978 there had been several continuances of hearings and depositions in this case. Affiant further understood that the target date for trial of this case was in December 1978.

"That prior to December 11, 1973, affiant called 'Information' for the telephone number of Judge Gene Williams of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, and was not given a specific number of Judge Williams, but was given the telephone number, 305-579-5775 for the Circuit Court of Dade County. Affiant then called that number and talked to an unknown female, and affiant inquired as to the status of the trial of this case which had been scheduled for December 1978. This unknown female stated that she was not the regular secretary of Judge Williams, but that all cases had been set over until after the first of the year.

"Affiant received no other notice of the trial of this case. He had no knowledge that the trial of this case occurred on December 11, 1978, until he received the Final Judgment.

"Further affiant states that the continuance of the trial date in December did not appear unusual in view of the Christmas holiday and in view of the previous continuances of hearings and depositions in this case. Affiant also states that he appeared or was represented at all previous hearings in the case and had not disregarded Notices of the Court or of the parties. Affiant also believes that he has meritorious defenses to this claim, and has always intended to defend this claim.

"Affiant also states that after the previous hearing in September 1978, he was hospitalized in September and October at the Eastern Long Island Hospital in Greenport, New York, for serious abdominal surgery including removal of parts of his intestines, and thereafter affiant underwent a substantial period of recuperation and adjustment. . . . This health condition delayed affiant's preparation for the scheduled trial in December 1978. Affiant did anticipate that he would be represented by counsel at the appropriate time, however, appearance of counsel was not made in December 1978, because affiant was advised that the trial was set over to 1979, as aforesaid. Affiant relied on the advice received in calling the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, and based on this advice, he assumed the case would not be reached for trial in December 1978."

"(T)hat he has meretorious defenses, by adopting and incorporating herein the defenses and affirmative defenses set forth in his answers and motions previously filed in this case, and by stating:

"A. He owed no debt to Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc.

"B. Any debt claimed by Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc., was on an open account and not subject to either a commercial or maritime lien.

"C. At no time has he received any notice of lien from Norwalk Cove Marina, Inc., or any process to establish any such lien.

"D. Prior to the Yacht Purchase Agreement, he represented to the Plaintiffs that he did not have a Master Carpenter's Certificate on the vessel. The Bill of Sale attached to Plaintiffs' Complaint...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Duckworth v. Duckworth, 81-2018
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 27, 1982
    ...with granting applications for relief so as to permit a determination of the controversy upon the merits. Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979); McAlice v. Kirsch, 368 So.2d 401 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1979). The principle of liberality places a heavier burden on the party seek......
  • Crocker Investments, Inc. v. Statesman Life Ins. Co., 87-294
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 10, 1987
    ...when required by the rules of civil procedure, causes the entrance of the default judgment to be improper. Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. Gregory, 96 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1957). Although this error does not usually render t......
  • Zettler v. Ehrlich
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 17, 1980
    ...as a paper is served before the default is actually entered, the rules required notice of the application. See Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Gould v. Ruzakowski, 322 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). If, after receiving notice, the defendant then "plead or otherwi......
  • EGF Tampa Associates v. Edgar V. Bohlen, G.F.G.M. A.G.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 28, 1988
    ...as a paper is served before the default is actually entered, the rules required notice of the application. See Kiaer v. Friendship, Inc., 376 So.2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Gould v. Ruzakowski, 322 So.2d 567 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). If, after receiving notice, the defendant then "plead or otherwi......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT