Kiene v. Gmehle
Decision Date | 19 May 1892 |
Citation | 52 N.W. 232,85 Iowa 312 |
Parties | KIENE v. GMEHLE ET AL. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from district court, Dubuque county; D. J. LINEHAN, Judge.
Action in equity to forclose two mortgages on certain real estate given by the defendants Emilie Gmehle and Gottfried Gmehle, her husband. Frederick Mack Gmehle, a minor, being made a defendant, as claiming an interest in the mortgaged property, answered by his guardian ad litem, claiming to be the owner of said real estate under the will of his grandfather, Jacob F. Mack, deceased, subject only to the life estate of his mother, the defendant Emilie Gmehle, and setting out said will. Plaintiff demurred to the answer, “and as grounds of demurrer states that the said will as pleaded gave the said Emilie Gmehle an absolute estate in fee simple in the mortgaged property, and the said Frederick Mack Gmehle took no interest in the same.” This demurrer being overruled, and the plaintiff refusing to further plead, his petition was dismissed as to the defendant Frederick Mack Gmehle. Plaintiff appeals.Alphons Matthews and Powers & Lacy, for appellant.
Henry Michel, for appellee.
1. Jacob F. and Maria Mack, husband and wife, being seised of separate estates, joined in executing their last will and testament as follows: Jacob F. Mack, the survivor, died in 1876, seised of the property in question. The defendant Frederick Mack Gmehle, is the son and only heir of Emilie Gmehle “of her body begotten.”
2. The question to be determined is whether by this will Mrs. Gmehle took an estate in fee simple or a life estate in the mortgaged property. If the former, the demurrer should have been sustained; if the latter, it was properly overruled. It is alleged that Jacob F. Mack died seised in fee simple of this property. The question before us is not affected by the provisions...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ault v. Hillyard
...has no application. The following case will be found to be more or less directly in point: Hopkins v. Grimes, 14 Iowa 73; Kiene v. Gmehle, 85 Iowa 312, 52 N.W. 232; Zavitz v. Preston, 96 Iowa 52, 64 N.W. Beedy v. Finney, 118 Iowa 276, 91 N.W. 1069; Taylor v. Taylor, 118 Iowa 407, 92 N.W. 71......
-
Ault v. Hillyard
...has no application. The following cases will be found to be more or less directly in point: Hopkins v. Grimes, 14 Iowa, 73;Kiene v. Gmehle, 85 Iowa, 312, 52 N. W. 232;Zavitz v. Preston, 96 Iowa, 52, 64 N. W. 668;Beedy v. Finney, 118 Iowa, 276, 91 N. W. 1069;Taylor v. Taylor, 118 Iowa, 407, ......
- Kiene v. Gmehle