Kiker v. Hefner, 44085

Citation168 S.E.2d 637,119 Ga.App. 629
Decision Date07 May 1969
Docket NumberNo. 44085,No. 3,44085,3
PartiesC. W. KIKER, Sr. v. Harold HEFNER, Commissioner, et al
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Syllabus by the Court

The trial court did not err in granting summary judgment for the defendants.

The plaintiff is a nonresident owner of real estate in Gilmer County who seeks relief by a petition for declaratory judgment naming various county officials as the defendants. He asks for declarations to the effect that ad valorem property taxes assessed on his property for 1966 above the amount tendered in payment are null and void, that the fi. fa. issued thereon is null and void, that the 1967 digest insofar as it relates to him is null and void, that any amount shown to be due over the amount shown by his 1967 tax return is null and void, and that the procedure used in preparing the 1968 tax digest, by assessing property for taxation at 40% of the fair market value and applying statutory exemptions against the 40% valuation, is illegal. He appeals from the grant of a summary judgment for the defendants.

Wright, Walther & Morgan, Clinton J. Morgan, Rome, for appellant.

P. T. McCutchen, Avary Dimmock, Jr., Ellijay, Herman J. Spence, Bobby C. Milam, Blue Ridge, for appellees.

JORDAN, Presiding Judge.

1. The ruling of the trial court refusing to dismiss the petition did not fix the law of the case to preclude final disposal thereof by the simultaneous grant of a summary judgment for the defendants. While a petition may amply meet the liberalized requirements of notice pleading under the Civil Practice Act, so as to preclude dismissal from a consideration of the petition alone, the court has authority to consider matter outside the pleadings, if presented, and if it does, as was done in the present case, it must dispose of the matter under summary judgment procedures. CPA §§ 12, 56; Code Ann. §§ 81A-112(c), 81A-156. We regard the ruling on the petition as merely a prelude to disposition of the matter by a ruling under the summary judgment procedures.

2. The motion for summary judgment is supported by evidence that at the time the petition for declaratory judgment was filed on December 22, 1967, and on the date of the trial court's order on September 6, 1968, granting the motion for summary judgment, cases number 922 and 930 involving substantially the same parties and the same issues were pending in Gilmer Superior Court. The trial court's order of September 6, 1968, recites that 'in case No. 930 Gilmer Superior Court, involving the same defendants, the plaintiff raised substantially the same issues concerning the 1966 ad valorem taxes and this court denied an interlocutoy injunction which was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia in Kiker v. Worley, 223 Ga. 736 (157 S.E.2d 745) (1967),' and that the plaintiff 'also brought an equitable action against these parties (Case No. 922, Gilmer Superior Court) raising substantially the same issues concerning the tax year 1967 and was subsequently amended to include the tax year 1968. This court denied a motion for summary judgment in Case No. 922, and the Supreme Court of Georgia affirmed, holding that the failure to tender the taxes due as condition precedent to bringing the action was a fatal defect and that in no event, under the facts appearing, could the plaintiff prevail in the action.' See Kiker v. Hefner, 224 Ga. 511, 162 S.E.2d 731.

A declaratory judgment will not be rendered to give an advisory opinion in regard to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • LaSalle Nat. Ins. Co. v. Popham
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 17, 1972
    ...v. Mayor, etc., of Baxley, 211 Ga. 1(1), 83 S.E.2d 606; Ulmer v. State Highway Dept., 90 Ga.App. 833, 84 S.E.2d 583; Kiker v. Hefner, 119 Ga.App. 629, 631, 168 S.E.2d 637; Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Berryman, 123 Ga.App. 71(1), 179 S.E.2d 2. Where, as in the present case, an action......
  • Anderson v. Crippen, 45027
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • May 20, 1970
  • Tennessee Farmers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Wheeler, 67379
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • March 7, 1984
    ...competent jurisdiction, in which the same questions may be raised and determined.' [Cit.]" Employers Liab., supra; Kiker v. Hefner, 119 Ga.App. 629, 631, 168 S.E.2d 637 (1969). To permit the declaratory judgment action to proceed under these circumstances is "manifestly unwise and unnecessa......
  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Hillhouse
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 2, 1974
    ...v. Mayor, etc., of Baxley, 211 Ga. 1(1), 83 S.E.2d 606; Ulmer v. State Hwy. Dept., 90 Ga.App. 833, 84 S.E.2d 583; Kiker v. Hefner, 119 Ga.App. 629, 631, 168 S.E.2d 637; Employers Liability Assur. Corp. v. Berryman, 123 Ga.App. 71(1), 179 S.E.2d 4. The decision in the case of LaSalle Nationa......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT