Kilgore v. Northwest Texas Baptist Educational Soc.
| Decision Date | 13 April 1896 |
| Citation | 35 S.W. 145 |
| Parties | KILGORE v. NORTHWEST TEXAS BAPTIST EDUCATIONAL SOC. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
R. E. Carswell and Bullock & Tankersley, for appellant. McMurray & Gose, C. B. Randell, and J. A. L. Wolfe, for appellee.
We understand the certificate, which includes question and lengthy explanatory statement, to submit for the determination of this court the following question of law: Was it error for the trial court to charge the jury, at request of plaintiff, that the estimates furnished by the architect are presumed to be correct, and that the burden is upon defendant to show the contrary by establishing fraud on part of the architect by a preponderance of evidence, in a case where plaintiff and defendant had agreed that the former should pay the latter as the work on the building progressed according to the estimates of the architect, and defendant, by pleading and proof, attacked the estimates on the ground that they were fraudulently issued by the architect for an amount grossly disproportionate to the amount of work done, for the purpose of forcing him to abandon the contract; "or, in other words, was it proper to instruct the jury that the presumption was in favor of the correctness of the architect's estimates?" Under a firmly established rule of law, the parties having agreed upon the estimates of the architect as the work progressed as the means of determining the extent of performance and the amount to be paid from time to time under the terms of the contract, such estimates, when made, established between the parties the facts therein found. They were not merely evidence from which a court or jury might have found or ought to have found such facts, but they were themselves findings of such facts by the architect, just as awards or judgments are findings of the facts of indebtedness therein stated by arbitrators or courts. It needed no finding of the jury to establish the facts stated in the findings of the architect, and therefore it was proper for the court to instruct that the law presumed them correct in the first instance, leaving to the jury the question whether defendant had shown such facts as would in law destroy the findings of the architect. Such a charge was not upon the weight to be given to the estimates as evidence of the amounts due at their...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Texas Fidelity & Bonding Co. v. Rosenberg Ind. School Dist.
...payments, made under these circumstances, were conclusive, since there were neither allegations nor proof of fraud. Kilgore v. Baptist Society, 89 Tex. 465-469, 35 S. W. 145; McKenzie v. Barrett, 43 Tex. Civ. App. 451, 98 S. W. Through several assignments, appellant attacks the judgment cla......
-
Blum Milling Co. v. Moore-Seaver Grain Co.
...Tendick, 73 Tex. 488, 11 S. W. 497, 5 L. R. A. 270; K. C., E. P. & M. Ry. Co. v. Perkins, 88 Tex. 66, 29 S. W. 1048; Kilgore v. Baptist Ed. Soc., 89 Tex. 465, 35 S. W. 145; Gorham v. Dallas, C. & S. W. Ry. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 106 S. W. 930; Kettler Brass Co. v. O'Neil, 57 Tex. Civ. App. 56......
-
Garrett v. Dodson
...arbitrator would justify an abandonment. Dallas, etc., v. Thomas, 36 Tex. Civ. App. 268, 81 S. W. 1041; Kilgore v. Northwest Educational Society, 89 Tex. 465, 35 S. W. 145; Kettler v. O'Neil, 57 Tex. Civ. App. 568, 122 S. W. 900; Jones v. Risley, 91 Tex. 7, 32 S. W. 1027; Railway v. Henry, ......
-
Leon v. Gulf Production Co.
...First Series, page 6329; 9 C. J. § 115, page 772; G., H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Henry & Dilly, 65 Tex. 685; Kilgore et al. v. Baptist Educational Society, 89 Tex. 465, 35 S. W. 145; Jones v. Gilchrist, 88 Tex. 92, 30 S. W. 442; Kettler Brass Mfg. Co. v. O'Neil, 57 Tex. Civ. App. 568, 122 S. W. ......