Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 75--447
| Decision Date | 18 February 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 75--447,75--447 |
| Citation | 327 So.2d 50 |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
| Parties | George KILLINGSWORTH, Individually, et al., Appellants, v. MONTGOMERY WARD & COMPANY, and Ryder Truck Rental, Appellees. |
Lex M. Taylor, Jr. of Taylor & Laurent, Lakeland, for appellants.
A. H. Lane of Langston, Lane, Massey, Trohn, Clarke & Bertrand, Bartow, for appellees.
Appellants/plaintiffs, all members of the George Killingsworth family, residents of Polk County, Florida, were vacationing in the State of New Mexico when the automobile in which they were riding was involved in a collision with a Ford two-ton truck operated by an employee of appellee, Montgomery Ward & Company. Appellee, Ryder Truck Rental, leased said vehicle to Montgomery Ward & Company. The appellants filed suit in Polk County for damages in this personal injury action arising out of the collision. The appellees were foreign corporations authorized to do business in Florida. No action was filed in New Maxico. Appellees filed a motion to transfer, abate or dismiss the action on the ground of forum non conveniens. After hearing, the trial court entered its order abating the action, leaving appellants to seek redress of their claimed injury in the courts of the State of New Mexico. This timely appeal from that order followed.
There was no question as to jurisdiction of the circuit court in Polk County to proceed, service of process having been accomplished upon appellees here in Florida in accordance with Section 48.081(5), Florida Statutes, which authorizes service on any corporation having a business office in the state and engaged in transaction of business therefrom. This statute provides that the cause of action does not have to arise from business within the state. See Crown Colony Club Ltd. v. Honecker, Fla.App.3d, 1974, 307 So.2d 889.
The sole issue, therefore, concerns the question of whether Florida or New Mexico is the proper venue. Section 47.051, Florida Statutes, provides in essential part:
. . . Actions against foreign corporations doing business in this state shall be brought in a county Where such corporation has an agent or other representative, where the cause of action accrued, or where the property in litigation is located. (Emphasis added).
The trial court, as stated previously herein, abated the action and in doing so applied the doctrine of forum non conveniens. While principles of this doctrine may have merit under...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Houston v. Caldwell
...512 (Fla.3d DCA 1967); Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Ganey, 125 So.2d 576 (Fla.3d DCA 1960); Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Company, 327 So.2d 50 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); cf. Morgan v. Ande, 313 So.2d 86 (Fla.4th DCA to proceed to a determination of whether the criteria necessary to......
-
Houston v. Caldwell
...with this opinion. It is so ordered. ADKINS, Acting C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur. 1 Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 327 So.2d 50 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976); Ganem v. Issa, 225 So.2d 564 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969); Adams v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 224 So.2d 797 (Fla.......
-
Dombroff v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc.
...in Florida, Confederation of Canada Life Insurance Co. v. Vega y Arminan, 144 So.2d 805 (Fla.1962); Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 327 So.2d 50 (Fla.2d DCA 1976); Crown Colony Club, Ltd. v. Honecker, 307 So.2d 889, 891 (Fla.3d DCA), cert. denied, 320 So.2d 392 (Fla.1975); Junction ......
-
Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company v. Swain
...46 L.Ed.2d 271 (1975); Schultz v. Great American Mortgage Investors, 306 So.2d 572 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975) and Killingsworth v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 327 So.2d 50 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1976). The order of the learned trial judge here interlocutory appeal AFFIRMED. BOYER, C. J., and RAWLS and McCORD, J......