Kimbro v. Lassiter

Decision Date20 April 1983
Citation648 S.W.2d 860
PartiesConnie KIMBRO, Appellant, v. Hon. James M. LASSITER, Judge, Calloway Circuit Court, and Hon. David Buckingham, Judge, Calloway District Court, Appellees.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky

Charles M. Chaney, Paducah, for appellant.

Max W. Parker, County Atty., Murray, for appellees.

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from an order of the Court of Appeals denying a writ of prohibition and/or mandamus which Kimbro sought against a circuit judge who remanded a misdemeanor to the district court for trial. We affirm.

The single issue is whether the trial judge committed reversible error in remanding a misdemeanor charge to the district court after a felony count that was coupled with the misdemeanor was dismissed by the circuit court.

Kimbro argues that the district court forever lost jurisdiction of the case and it should be tried by the circuit court.

We affirm the order of the Court of Appeals denying the writ of prohibition and/or mandamus.

The district court has exclusive jurisdiction to dispose of misdemeanors pursuant to KRS 24A.110(2). The case of Keller v. Commonwealth, Ky., 594 S.W.2d 589 (1980), held that pursuant to statute where a misdemeanor and a felony are joined together, the circuit court has jurisdiction of the misdemeanor. The statute and the case law is clear. The district court has exclusive jurisdiction of a misdemeanor unless it is joined with a felony. When the felony was dismissed, the circuit court was correct in remanding the remaining misdemeanor charge to the district court for trial.

An inherent part of the circuit court's jurisdiction is the authority to remand the remaining misdemeanor. In no sense would such a remand be an interference by a circuit court with the authority of a district court. It is simply an orderly disposition of the case consistent with the exclusive statutory jurisdiction.

It is the holding of this Court that where a felony and misdemeanor are originally joined but later separated, the circuit court may remand the misdemeanor to the district court for disposition.

The order of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Com. v. Adkins
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • September 28, 2000
    ...as the charges were joined in the same indictment. We agree with Judge Knox's dissenting opinion that our decision in Kimbro v. Lassiter, Ky., 648 S.W.2d 860 (1983), provides a much better analysis of this Kimbro involved the issue of whether remanding a misdemeanor charge to the district c......
  • Com. v. Arnette, 85-SC-545-CL
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court — District of Kentucky
    • December 19, 1985
    ...the felony charge to the grand jury could not likewise hold the less serious misdemeanor over to that grand jury. See Kimbro v. Lassiter, Ky., 648 S.W.2d 860 (1983). RCr 1.04 provides that the Rules of Criminal Procedure are intended to provide for a just determination of every criminal pro......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT