King v. State
Decision Date | 10 March 1987 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 43 |
Citation | 505 So.2d 403 |
Parties | Christopher Doyle KING v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals |
Lawrence B. Sheffield, Jr., and Lawrence B. Sheffield III of Sheffield & Sheffield, Birmingham, for appellant.
Charles A. Graddick, Atty. Gen., and P. David Bjurberg, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
The case was tried to a jury, and on October 3, 1985, the jury returned a verdict of guilty of murder, as charged in count one. The trial court sentenced appellant to twenty years in the penitentiary and fined him $1,000, payable to the Alabama Crime Victims Compensation Fund.
King appeals, raising one issue: "Whether or not the State of Alabama failed to prove that the appellant manifested extreme indifference to human life in general as required by Section 13A-6-2(a)(2) of the Alabama Code so as to support a conviction for reckless murder." This issue was properly preserved for our review by a motion for judgment of acquittal made at the conclusion of the State's case-in-chief and by motion for new trial, both of which were overruled.
The evidence presented by the State disclosed that on the evening of November 22, 1984, Dwight Lee Reeves and his cousin, Rodney Dunnaway, traveled from Fultondale to Birmingham to visit Trader Johns, a nightclub in east Birmingham. They traveled in Dunnaway's automobile. That same evening, appellant and a friend, Bobby Knight, visited the same club. They traveled in appellant's blue pickup truck. While at the club, appellant and Reeves apparently "bumped" into each other and exchanged words. Both were apparently upset by the encounter. Dunnaway and Reeves left the club around 1:30 a.m. to go home. Appellant and Knight left shortly before Dunnaway and Reeves. As Dunnaway and Reeves were pulling out of the parking lot of the club, a blue pickup truck pulled up closely behind Dunnaway's automobile and stopped for a short period. Dunnaway was driving, and Reeves was sitting on the passenger's side in the front seat of the automobile. Dunnaway drove away from the club, entered the interstate highway, and proceeded westward toward downtown Birmingham and Fultondale at a speed of approximately fifty-five miles per hour. Appellant and Knight left the parking lot of the club in the pickup truck, which appellant was driving, and after entering the interstate highway, proceeded westward in the same direction as Dunnaway was proceeding, and in the opposite direction from appellant's home. Appellant observed Dunnaway's automobile and recognized the passenger, Reeves, as the person with whom he had had the altercation at the club. Appellant drove his truck closely behind Dunnaway's automobile and, while blinking his truck's lights, "tailgated" it for several miles. Dunnaway reduced his speed several times to let the truck pass, but it continued closely behind him. As the vehicles approached the 31st Street exit, appellant pulled a .38-caliber pistol from under the seat of his truck, pulled up beside Dunnaway's automobile on the right side, fired two or three shots at the vehicle, and turned right on the off-ramp, leaving the interstate highway. Bullets struck the rear tires of Dunnaway's vehicle, causing them to immediately go flat, and the vehicle came to a halt some distance beyond the 31st Street exit. One bullet pierced the window on the passenger's side and struck Reeves in the head. He fell over into Dunnaway's lap. Reeves died from the head wound several hours later. Reeves and Dunnaway were unarmed and did nothing to provoke the shooting. Appellant went home immediately after the incident and did not report it. The police investigation ultimately led to his arrest some two months later. Appellant gave conflicting stories to several persons about the incident, and when arrested, falsely stated that he had no knowledge of the incident. He disposed of the pistol in a "dumpster," and it was never recovered. The State's case was primarily based upon the testimony of Dunnaway and Knight, and the testimony of each was essentially consistent with the other's.
Knight, testifying for the State, stated that, just before the incident, appellant stated that he was going to "mess with them and shoot the tires out." He further testified that, just after the shooting, appellant stated that he "might have messed up or he shot the window out." In substance, Knight testified that there was no provocation or excuse for appellant's actions.
This court interpreted the meaning of reckless homicide proscribed by § 13A-6-2(a)(2), in Northington v. State, 413 So.2d 1169 (Ala.Cr.App.1981), cert. quashed, 413 So.2d 1172 (Ala.1982). Therein, we stated the following:
Id. at 1172. The Supreme Court of Alabama subsequently adopted this interpretation. Ex parte Washington, 448 So.2d 404, 408 (Ala.1984); Ex parte McCormack, 431 So.2d 1340 (Ala.1983).
In Ex parte Weems, 463 So.2d 170, 172 (Ala.1984), the Supreme Court, in an opinion by Justice Faulkner, stated the following:
We find in a discussion of "depraved heart murder" in LaFave & Scott, Criminal Law, § 70 (1972), the following:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sheffield v. State Of Ala.
...Comment 4 to § 210.03." 463 So. 2d at 172 (footnote omitted). With regard to reckless murder, this Court stated, in King v. State, 505 So. 2d 403, 407 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987): "Section 13A-6-2(a)(2) requires the prosecution to prove conduct which manifests an extreme indifference to human li......
-
Sheffield v. State
...Comment 4 to § 210.03.”463 So.2d at 172 (footnote omitted). With regard to reckless murder, this Court stated, in King v. State, 505 So.2d 403, 407 (Ala.Crim.App.1987): “Section 13A–6–2(a)(2) requires the prosecution to prove conduct which manifests an extreme indifference to human life, an......
-
Ruiz v. State
...under the clear language of § 13A-6-2(a)(2) is 'conduct which manifests an extreme indifference to human life.' King v. State, 505 So. 2d 403, 407 (Ala. Cr. App. 1987). The appellant asserts that the prosecution failed to prove 'that he acted with "extreme indifference to human life." ' We ......
-
Holder v. State, 8 Div. 470
...to the State. Daniels v. State, 581 So.2d 536 (Ala.Cr.App.1990); Higdon v. State, 527 So.2d 1352 (Ala.Cr.App.1988); King v. State, 505 So.2d 403 (Ala.Cr.App.1987). In the instant case the evidence presented was circumstantial evidence. Circumstantial evidence is not inferior or deficient ev......
-
§ 31.05 MURDER: "DEPRAVED HEART" ("EXTREME RECKLESSNESS") MURDER
...mean much to a cardiologist").[92] . People v. Suarez, 844 N.E.2d 721, 728 (N.Y. 2005) (quoting earlier N.Y. cases).[93] . King v. State, 505 So. 2d 403, 408 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987).[94] . People v. Love, 111 Cal. App. 3d 98, 105 (Ct. App. 1980).[95] . Lloyd Weinreb & Dan M. Kahan, Homicide:......
-
§ 31.05 Murder: "Depraved Heart" ("Extreme Recklessness") Murder
...mean much to a cardiologist").[92] People v. Suarez, 844 N.E.2d 721, 728 (N.Y. 2005) (quoting earlier N.Y. cases).[93] King v. State, 505 So. 2d 403, 408 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987).[94] People v. Love, 111 Cal. App. 3d 98, 105 (1980).[95] Lloyd Weinreb & Dan M. Kahan, Homicide: Legal Aspects, i......
-
TABLE OF CASES
...Ct. App. 1988), 497 King v. Commonwealth, 513 S.W.3d 919 (Ky. 2017), 306 King v. State, 357 S.W.2d 42 (Tenn. 1962), 551 King v. State, 505 So. 2d 403 (Ala. Crim. App. 1987), 487 King, State v., 235 P.3d 240 (Ariz. 2010), 212 Kinney, People v., 691 N.E.2d 867 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998) (dictum), 5......