King v. State , ED 94808.
| Decision Date | 17 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | No. ED 94808.,ED 94808. |
| Citation | 341 S.W.3d 737 |
| Parties | Jeremy KING, Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HEREAppeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Timothy J. Wilson, Judge.Maleaner Harvey, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.Chris Koster, Atty. Gen., Karen L. Kramer, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.Before ROY L. RICHTER, C.J., KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., and GARY DIAL, Sp. J.
Jeremy King appeals the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Etenburn v. State
...341 S.W.3d 737Charles S. ETENBURN, Movant–Appellant,v.STATE of Missouri, Respondent–Respondent.No. SD 30503.Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One.May 17, [341 S.W.3d 738] Craig A. Johnston, Columbia, MO, for Movant–Appellant.Chris Koster, Attorney General, and Richard A......