Kirby v. State, 88-3229

Decision Date08 December 1989
Docket NumberNo. 88-3229,88-3229
Citation553 So.2d 1290,14 Fla. L. Weekly 2816
Parties14 Fla. L. Weekly 2816 Troy Dell KIRBY, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, Kathleen Stover, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., John M. Koenig, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

WENTWORTH, Judge.

Appellant seeks review of consecutive five year sentences for two counts of grand theft, and concurrent five year sentences for two counts of passing a worthless bank check. The sentences exceed the Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701 guidelines recommendation of community control or 12 to 30 months incarceration. Because we find that two of the court's three written reasons permit departure from the guidelines recommendation, in accordance with section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes, we affirm the challenged sentences.

The court's written sentencing order specified three reasons for departing from the guidelines recommendation. The first stated reason was that:

[Appellant] was convicted ... of two felonies which were not scored ... because they were convictions occurring after the commission of the ... offenses in this case.

At sentencing it was represented to the court that the referenced felonies were committed after the offenses for which appellant was being sentenced. In such circumstances the two additional felonies could not be scored as "prior record" under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5)(a), and may serve as a basis for departure. See Merriex v. State, 521 So.2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). While appellant now contests the temporal sequence established below with regard to the various offenses, no such challenge was presented at sentencing and we therefore decline to entertain this factual dispute on appeal. Appellant further argues that in departing from the guidelines recommendation the court imposed a sentence far in excess of that which would have been recommended had the additional felonies been scored under "prior record." While appellant deems this a "proportionality" argument, he is essentially challenging the extent of departure, which is not subject to appellate review. See section 921.001(5), Florida Statutes.

As an additional reason for departing from the guidelines recommendation the court also stated that:

... [Appellant] has entered into an escalating pattern of criminal behavior ... starting with misdemeanor worthless checks and escalating in the past three (3) years to felony fraudulent activities in regards to 'worthless check kiting' as had been exhibited in this case.

Insofar as this escalating pattern is supported by an evidentiary predicate, it constitutes a permissible reason for departing from the guidelines recommendation. See e.g., Ponder v. State, 530 So.2d 1057 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Keys v. State, 500 So.2d 134 (Fla.1986). Section 921.001(8), Florida Statutes, expressly approves an "escalating pattern of criminal conduct" as a permissible reason for departure, noting that it "may be evidenced by a progression from nonviolent to violent crimes or a progression of increasingly violent crimes." While appellant's offenses do not involve violent crimes, we do not construe section 921.001(8) as necessarily requiring a violent progression, as the statutory language indicating that an escalating...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Peters v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 2013
    ...are given, “ ‘the departure shall be upheld when at least one circumstance or factor justifies the departure.’ ” Kirby v. State, 553 So.2d 1290, 1292 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (quoting § 921.001(5), Fla. Stat. (1989)). As “an inherent component of the crime, ... [f]actors already taken into accou......
  • Williams v. State, 91-681
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1992
    ...departure. See Puffinberger v. State, 581 So.2d 897 (Fla.1991); Wichael v. State, 567 So.2d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Kirby v. State, 553 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) rev. denied, 562 So.2d 346 (Fla.1990). Therefore, the trial court properly departed from the sentencing guidelines in sente......
  • Haye v. State, 92-1019
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • March 5, 1993
    ...So.2d 1253 (Fla. 5th DCA) rev. denied, 606 So.2d 1167 (Fla.1992); Wichael v. State, 567 So.2d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Kirby v. State, 553 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) rev. denied, 562 So.2d 346 (Fla.1990); Merriex v. State, 521 So.2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).9 See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(5......
  • Wichael v. State, 89-1920
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1990
    ...that a trial court may base a departure sentence on criminal convictions which cannot be scored as "prior record." See Kirby v. State, 553 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), rev. denied, 562 So.2d 346 (Fla.1990); Austin v. State, 507 So.2d 132 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Paschall v. State, 501 So.2d ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT