Kirk v. State, A--15765

Decision Date07 June 1972
Docket NumberNo. A--15765,A--15765
Citation498 P.2d 412
PartiesJobie KIRK, Appellant, v. The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.
CourtUnited States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Archibald Hill, Jr., Oklahoma City, for appellant.

Larry Derryberry, Atty. Gen., Sondra Leah Fogley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

BUSSEY, Presiding Judge:

Appellant Jobie Kirk, hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the District Court of Carter County, Oklahoma, for the offense of Larceny of Domestic Animals; his punishment was fixed at three (3) years imprisonment, and from said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.

At the trial, Robert Bust testified that he was directed by Sheriff Rudd to take certain photographs on or about December 10, 1968. He identified State's Exhibits One and Two as the photographs that he took at the Sheriff's request.

Sheriff Rudd identified the pictures of the cow and calf, a Bang tag which was taken from the cow's ear depicted in the photograph, and a bank deposit slip given him by the defendant on December 3 or 4, 1968.

Dennis Maher testified that he was a farmer-rancher and that in October, 1968, he discovered a Hereford cow and a black calf missing. He testified that the cow was branded with a JD connected on the right hip. In November, 1968, he observed the cow and calf going through a sale barn in Sulphur. He testified that the cattle were in the possession of the defendant. He asked the defendant where he had obtained the cow and calf and the defendant stated that he had bought them. Maher returned to Ardmore and notified the County Sheriff. He identified the photographs as being pictures of his cow and calf that were sold at the Sulphur Sale Barn.

Jim Freeman testified that he helped his parents operate the Sulphur Sale Barn. He identified a check issued by his mother as one given the defendant on November 29, 1968, for the purchase of a cow and calf. The State and defendant then stipulated that the defendant did receive the check in the amount of two hundred ninety- nine dollars and ninety-nine cents ($299.99) from the Freeman Livestock Auction and that the check was deposited to the defendant's account in the Exchange National Bank.

Dr. Willis, a Veterinarian, identified the metal 'Bang tag' as the same one he had placed in the ear of a cow owned by Dennis Maher on September 16, 1967. He testified that it was not possible for any tags to have duplicate numbers and the tags were furnished by the United States Department of Agriculture.

Deputy Denney testified that he was present when the photographs of the cow and calf were taken and that the cow had a 'JD brand on her right hip.' He testified that on December 9, 1968, he placed defendant under arrest and transported him to Sheriff Rudd's office. Both Marvin Turner and Sheriff Rudd advised the defendant of his 'rights.' He further testified that defendant acknowledged that he understood his rights and agreed to talk to the Sheriff.

Sheriff Rudd was recalled and testified that he advised the defendant of his constitutional rights by reading to him from a card. He further testified that Marvin Turner, an employee of the Cattlemen's Association, also advised the defendant of his rights. Defendant first stated that he bought the cow and calf at a livestock auction at Milburn. He subsequently admitted that he loaded the cow and calf at his mother's and took them to the sale barn in Sulphur and that he had done it without permission.

Marvin Turner testified that he was a brand inspector for the Texas Southwestern Cattlemen's Association. He further testified that both he and Sheriff Rudd advised the defendant of his constitutional rights. Defendant, after first stating that he had purchased the cows, later admitted that 'I let them out of the pasture and drove them down to mother's place and loaded them.'

For the defense, Sheriff Rudd was recalled and testified that the defendant's confession was neither reduced to writing nor recorded.

The defendant testified that he was employed as a mortician and was engaged in the cattle business as a side line. He testified that according to his records (which were not introduced into evidence) he bought the cow in question from Pat Telford in 1967. He testified that the cow was placed in a pasture which adjoined the pasture...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Turman v. State, F--73--390
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • April 24, 1974
    ...Court of Criminal Appeals. See Roberts v. State, Okl.Cr., 479 P.2d 623 (1971); Box v. State, Okl.Cr., 505 P.2d 995 (1973); Kirk v. State, Okl.Cr., 498 P.2d 412 (1972). The defendant's third proposition of error asserts prejudice as a result of an evidentiary harpoon. The Court would agree t......
  • McGlumphy v. State
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
    • July 14, 1975
    ...New Trial reveals that defendant nowhere raised this issue at trial, thereby waiving her right to do so on appeal. See, Kirk v. State, Okl.Cr., 498 P.2d 412 (1972); Workman v. State, Okl.Cr., 491 P.2d 311 (1971); Application of Poston, Okl.Cr., 281 P.2d 776 For the foregoing reasons, we fin......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT