Kirton v. Howard
Decision Date | 26 August 1926 |
Docket Number | 12059. |
Parties | KIRTON et al. v. HOWARD et al. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Williamsburg County; J. K Henry, Judge.
Action by J. M. Kirton and others against D. C. Howard and others. Judgment on directed verdict for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal. Reversed, and cause remanded for entry of judgment for plaintiffs.
Philip H. Stoll, of Kingstree, for appellants.
A. C Hinds and Lee & Shuler, all of Kingstree, for respondents.
The appellants, as plaintiffs, brought action in the court of common pleas of Williamsburg county for the recovery of the possession of a tract of land, situate in that county containing 142 acres, more or less. The complaint is in the usual form of complaints for the recovery of real property. The defendant D. C. Howard, claiming to be the owner of the lands in dispute, in his answer, after alleging that he is in possession of the land and that he is seized in fee thereof, also pleaded, as shown in the "case," the following defenses: (1) The 10-year statute of limitations. (2) Adverse possession. (3) The 20-year statute. (4) The 40-year statute. (5) Purchaser for value without notice.
The defendant Federal Land Bank of Columbia in its answer alleged the first four defenses, stated above, of the defendant Howard, and as another defense set up that it was an innocent incumbrancer for value without notice. The defendant Rhem Real Estate Company, made default.
At the conclusion of all the testimony in the cause, the plaintiff's moved for a directed verdict in their favor, and, the defendants Howard and Federal Land Bank of Columbia made a similar motion for such verdict in their favor. The presiding judge, Hon. J. K. Henry, refused the motion of plaintiffs and granted that of the defendants.
From the refusal to grant their motion, and from the granting of the motion for the defendants, the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.
The facts of the controversy, as brought out in the trial below, shown in the record before this court, are these:
Robert T. B. Abrams, then owner of a tract of land in Williamsburg county, containing about 900 acres, known as "the Black River tract," on September 24, 1856, executed and delivered his deed of trust, conveying thereby said tract of land to William J. Cooper, as trustee, for the uses and purposes set forth in the deed, as follows:
"In trust and confidence, nevertheless, and for the following uses and purposes and for no other, that is to say, for the joint use and benefit of my said children Robert Abrams and Agnes T. Abrams and the survivors of them until they arrive at the age of twenty-one years and upon their arrival at the age of twenty-one years then in trust to divide the said land into two equal moieties and to assign and convey one part or moiety thereof to the said Robert Abrams and to assign and convey the other part or moiety thereof to the said Agnes T. Abrams in such manner that each of my said children shall have, hold, use and enjoy, respectively the shares which may be allotted to them respectively during their respective natural lives and upon the death of either of my children then in trust to convey the said moiety or part of such child so dying to such child or children as such deceased child shall have living at his or her death and in case either of my said children shall die without leaving a child or children living at his or her death then in trust to convey the said moiety or part to the survivor of them and in case both shall die without leaving a child or children living then in trust to convey the said land respectively to me, the said Robert T. B. Abrams, discharged from further trust."
The consideration of the deed was "the natural love and affection" which the grantor had for his children, Robert and Agnes, the latter having later married James M. Kirton. This deed was duly recorded in the office of the clerk of court for Williamsburg county November 25, 1856.
In the year 1862 the said Robert T. B. Abrams, the grantor in the said trust deed, filed his petition in the court of equity for Williamsburg county, and alleged therein that, since the execution and delivery of the deed to Cooper, as trustee, the said Cooper had died; that the petitioner, Robert T. B. Abrams, and his two children, Robert and Agnes, had continued to live on the tract of land conveyed by the deed and had continued to use and cultivate the same; that one Joseph B. Allston desired to purchase the tract and offered therefor the sum of $6,000, if proper title thereto could be procured; that it was to the advantage of his children, Robert and Agnes, the cestuis que trustent, that the offer of Allston be accepted. The petitioner prayed that a new trustee be appointed, who should be given authority to invest the purchase money of the lands to be sold to Allston, said money to be held by the said newly appointed trustee subject to the same trusts and limitations expressed in the deed from himself to Cooper as trustee, hereinbefore referred to. The children, Robert and Agnes, and the heirs at law of Cooper, the deceased trustee, were properly made parties to this proceeding.
The cause in equity was referred to R. C. Logan, Esq., then commissioner in equity. He found the facts alleged in the petition to be true, and recommended the sale to Allston and the investment of the proceeds of sale as prayed for in the petition, and, he recommended the appointment of one James C. Sanders as trustee. Sanders consented to act in that capacity. Following the report of the commissioner, on December 22, 1862, Chancellor John A. Inglis, after a hearing of the cause, made his order, the pertinent portions of which are as follows:
On May 11, 1863, Logan, commissioner, executed and delivered to Allston a deed to said tract of land. On the same day Allston paid on the purchase price the sum of $2,000, and executed to the commissioner a mortgage of the premises to secure the payment of $4,000, balance of the purchase price. Allston failed to pay the balance of the purchase price, secured by his mortgage. Thereupon, an agreement was entered into by him, Robert T. B. Abrams, the trustor, Robert Abrams, and Agnes T. Kirton (née Abrams), to the effect that the sum of $2,000, paid on the purchase price by Allston, should be applied as rent for the lands during the period he had been in possession thereof; that the mortgage from Allston to the commissioner should be canceled; that Allston was to convey the land to Sanders, as trustee, upon the same trusts and limitations as contained in the original deed of trust from Robert T. B. Abrams to William J. Cooper, trustee; and that the commissioner was to deliver to Allston his bond for the balance due on the purchase money and was to satisfy the purchase-money mortgage.
Carrying out the terms of this last-mentioned agreement, Chancellor Inglis, on November 13, 1865, passed the following order:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Jennings v. McCowan
... ... reason of the fact that defendant had plead only a general ... denial, see also Kirton v. Howard, 137 S.C. 11, 134 ... S.E. 859 ... Appellants ... contend that such authority is not controlling here in that ... ...
-
Ex parte Johnson
...arises in that property in favor of the person or persons entitled to the funds with which the property is purchased. Kirton v. Howard, 137 S.C. 11, 134 S.E. 859, cases therein cited. The case cannot be different where no money was actually paid in by Bradford Keel and received back by him ......
-
Wallace v. Quick
... ... 420, 110 S.E ... 791, 793; Glenn v. Walker, 113 S.C. 1, 100 S.E. 706; ... Whitaker v. Jeffcoat, 128 S.C. 404, 122 S.E. 495, ... 496; Kirton v. Howard, 137 S.C. 11, 134 S.E. 859, ... 867; Southern Railroad Co. v. Day, 140 S.C. 388, 138 ... S.E. 870, 878 ... But I ... ...
-
Southern Ry. Co. v. Swift & Co.
...the mortgage was given. See, also, Marsh v. Ramsay, 57 S.C. 121, 35 S.E. 433; Bank v. Munn, 134 S.C. 297, 131 S.E. 432; Kirton v. Howard, 137 S.C. 11, 134 S.E. 859. is essentially a creature of equity. Can there be any comparison between the equitable position of a carrier which has paid a ......