Kitchen v. Crotona Park W. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.

Decision Date13 December 2016
Citation41 N.Y.S.3d 885 (Mem),145 A.D.3d 521,2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 08323
Parties William KITCHEN, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. CROTONA PARK WEST HOUSING DEVELOPMENT FUND CORPORATION, et al., Defendants–Appellants.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, New York (Amara S. Faulkner of counsel), for appellants.

Simon Eisenberg & Baum, LLP, New York (Eric M. Baum of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Elizabeth A. Taylor, J.), entered October 21, 2015, which, in this action for personal injuries sustained when part of the ceiling in plaintiff's apartment fell on his head, denied defendants' motion to reargue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from a nonappealable order.

Following the filing of a note of issue, defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Supreme Court denied the motion because it was untimely and defendants had failed to demonstrate good cause to excuse the untimeliness (see Brill v. City of New York, 2 N.Y.3d 648, 652, 781 N.Y.S.2d 261, 814 N.E.2d 431 [2004] ); defendants did not appeal from that order.

Defendants moved to reargue and the court denied the motion. Defendants' appeal from that order must be dismissed since no appeal lies from the denial of a motion for reargument (see D'Alessandro v. Carro, 123 A.D.3d 1, 7, 992 N.Y.S.2d 520 [1st Dept.2014] ). Furthermore, since defendants did not appeal from the order that denied their motion for summary judgment, their arguments on the merits are not properly before this Court (see D'Andrea v. Hutchins, 69 A.D.3d 541, 892 N.Y.S.2d 761 [1st Dept.2010] ).

TOM, J.P., FRIEDMAN, SAXE, FEINMAN, KAHN, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Lewis v. Rutkovsky
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 29, 2017
    ...In general, an order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable (see e.g. Kitchen v. Crotona Park W. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 145 A.D.3d 521, 41 N.Y.S.3d 885 [1st Dept.2016] ). Here, however, although the motion court purported to deny the motion to reargue, it nonetheless considered t......
  • Quishpi v. 80 Wea Owner, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 13, 2016
    ...145 A.D.3d 52143 N.Y.S.3d 3192016 N.Y. Slip Op. 08324Segundo QUISHPI, Plaintiff–Respondent–Appellant,v.80 WEA OWNER, LLC, et al., Defendants–Appellants–Respondents.80 WEA Owner, LLC, Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellant,Air Export Mechanical, Third–Party Defendant–Respondent.Supreme Court, Appel......
  • People v. Mitchell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 13, 2016
    ...A.D.3d 52541 N.Y.S.3d 885 (Mem)2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 08327The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,v.Keith MITCHELL, Defendant–Appellant.Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.Dec. 13, 2016.Seymour W. James, Jr., The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ellen Dille of cou......
  • Mill Fin., LLC v. Gillett
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 25, 2017
    ...the order denying reargument must be dismissed as no appeal lies from an order denying argument (Kitchen v. Corona Park W. Hous. Dev. Fund Corp., 145 A.D.3d 521, 41 N.Y.S.3d 885 [1st Dept. 2016] ). We have considered the remaining arguments and find them ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT