Kitsap Alliance Of Prop. Owners v. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 83883-6.
| Decision Date | 28 April 2010 |
| Docket Number | No. 83883-6.,83883-6. |
| Citation | 168 Wash.2d 1031,231 P.3d 166 |
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Parties | KITSAP ALLIANCE OF PROPERTY OWNERS, William Palmer and Ron Ross, Respondents,v.CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTH MANAGEMENT HEARINGS BOARD, Futurewise, Hood Canal Environmental Council, Kitsap Citizens for Responsible Planning, Respondents,Kitsap County, Petitioner,Judith Krigsman, Jim Trainer, West Sound Conservation Council, Respondents. |
Prior report: 152 Wash.App. 190, 217 P.3d 365.
¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Madsen and Justices Alexander, Chambers, Fairhurst and Stephens (Justice Sanders sat for Justice Chambers), at its April 27, 2010, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.
¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:
¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is granted and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals Division Two for reconsideration in light of Engrossed House Bill 1653 (Chapter 107, Laws of 2010). The Respondent Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners' motion to strike supplemental memorandum and the Petitioner's motion to strike portions of Respondent's supplemental brief are passed to the Court of Appeals for determination.
/s/MADSEN, C.J.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Kitsap Alliance of Prop. Owners v. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd.
...with directions that this court consider the effect of the new legislation. Order, Kitsap Alliance of Property Owners v. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 168 Wash.2d 1031, 231 P.3d 166 (2010). We ordered briefing concerning the new legislation and subsequently heard argument.ANA......
-
Tienne v. Pierce County
... ... W. Wash. Growth Mgmt. Hearings Bd., 164 Wash.2d 242, 189 P.3d ... the County stated: Neighboring property owners argued that the Vested Rights Doctrine should not ... decision in Futurewise when deciding Kitsap Alliance of Prop. Owners v. Cent. Puget Sound ... ...
-
Chapter § 2.15 - Relationship Between a GMA Comprehensive Plan and the SMA
...matter to Division II of the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of EHB 1653. Kitsap Alliance of Prop. Owners, 168 Wn.2d 1031, 231 P.3d 166 On remand, there was no debate that the legislature had resolved, on a going-forward basis, the issue about the applicability of GMA-based re......