Kleeman v. Kingsley, No. 26308.

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Missouri
Writing for the CourtRobert S. Barney
Citation167 S.W.3d 198
PartiesB. Leon KLEEMAN and Glenda Kleeman, Respondents, v. Kiman J. KINGSLEY and Betty Darlene Kingsley, et al., Appellants.
Docket NumberNo. 26308.
Decision Date31 May 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Lau v. Pugh, No. SD 29289.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • December 1, 2009
    ...we must defer to the trial court on factual issues and cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge.'" Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Mo.App. 2005) (quoting Chapman v. Lavy, 20 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Mo.App.2000)). In our review, this Court defers to the trial court in is......
  • Burris v. Mercer County, No. WD 67601.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • April 1, 2008
    ...often have confused opinions, which seem to conflate the issue of establishing county roads and abandoning them. See Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 204, 206 (Mo.App. S.D.2005)(although the court mentioned testimony establishing that no public moneys had been expended on maintenance of......
  • Lau v. Pugh, No. SD 29289 (Mo. App. 11/4/2009), No. SD 29289.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 2009
    ...we must defer to the trial court on factual issues and cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge.'" Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Mo.App. 2005) (quoting Chapman v. Lavy, 20 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Mo.App. 2000)). In our review, this Court defers to the trial court in i......
  • Dills v. Dills, No. SD 29234.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • January 27, 2010
    ...as true the evidence and inferences favorable to the trial court's judgment, disregarding all contrary evidence.'" Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Mo.App.2005) (quoting Behr v. Bird Way, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 470, 472 (Mo.App.1996)). "The trial court is entitled to believe all, part, o......
4 cases
  • Lau v. Pugh, No. SD 29289.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • December 1, 2009
    ...we must defer to the trial court on factual issues and cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge.'" Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Mo.App. 2005) (quoting Chapman v. Lavy, 20 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Mo.App.2000)). In our review, this Court defers to the trial court in is......
  • Burris v. Mercer County, No. WD 67601.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • April 1, 2008
    ...often have confused opinions, which seem to conflate the issue of establishing county roads and abandoning them. See Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 204, 206 (Mo.App. S.D.2005)(although the court mentioned testimony establishing that no public moneys had been expended on maintenance of......
  • Lau v. Pugh, No. SD 29289 (Mo. App. 11/4/2009), No. SD 29289.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • November 4, 2009
    ...we must defer to the trial court on factual issues and cannot substitute our judgment for that of the trial judge.'" Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Mo.App. 2005) (quoting Chapman v. Lavy, 20 S.W.3d 610, 612 (Mo.App. 2000)). In our review, this Court defers to the trial court in i......
  • Dills v. Dills, No. SD 29234.
    • United States
    • Court of Appeal of Missouri (US)
    • January 27, 2010
    ...as true the evidence and inferences favorable to the trial court's judgment, disregarding all contrary evidence.'" Kleeman v. Kingsley, 167 S.W.3d 198, 202 (Mo.App.2005) (quoting Behr v. Bird Way, Inc., 923 S.W.2d 470, 472 (Mo.App.1996)). "The trial court is entitled to believe all, part, o......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT