Klemens v. Badger Mut. Ins. Co. of Milwaukee
Decision Date | 01 December 1959 |
Citation | 8 Wis.2d 565,99 N.W.2d 865 |
Parties | Evelyn KLEMENS, Appellant, v. BADGER MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. OF MILWAUKEE, Respondent. |
Court | Wisconsin Supreme Court |
Jack J. Schumacher, Shawano, Howard N. Lehner, Oconto Falls, Adolph P. Lehner, Oconto Falls, of counsel for appellant.
Benton, Bosser, Fulton, Menn & Nehs, Appleton, Peter S. Nelson, Appleton, of counsel, for respondent.
Mr. and Mrs. Klemens owned a dwelling as joint tenants. They insured it in their joint names against loss by fire for $9,000 by a policy written by defendant Badger Mutual Insurance Company of Milwaukee. The policy contained a provision that the Company is not liable for loss caused by neglect of the insured to save and preserve the property at and after a loss.
Then Mr. and Mrs. Klemens mortgaged the property for $6,500 to Shawano Savings & Loan Association. The said insurance policy contained a 'loss payable' clause protecting the mortgagee.
After the policy and the mortgage had been executed Mr. Klemens intentionally set fire to the insured property and loss resulted. He was convicted of arson. Mrs. Klemens was not implicated in her husband's act. She is the sole plaintiff and brings this action to recover the indemnity named in the policy. She submits that as an assured, innocent of all wrong-doing, her right to recover under the policy is unaffected by the act of her husband.
The law is settled to the contrary. Counsel for respondent has correctly stated it as follows:
Appellant attempts to avoid the rule of the Bellman case (Bellman v. Home Ins. Co.), 1922, 178 Wis. 349, 189 N.W. 1028, 27 A.L.R. 945, pointing out that the coownership of the property arose in Bellman from a partnership, whereas in the instant case it arose from joint tenancy. That is immaterial. What is material is the fact that the insurance was written in the joint names of Mr. and Mrs. Klemens and they have a joint obligation to comply with the terms of the policy. The Bellman principle has been applied in numerous cases regardless of the origin of the common ownership of the insured property. Thus Bellman was cited and the principle...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hedtcke v. Sentry Ins. Co.
...Those cases are Bellman v. Home Insurance Company of New York, 178 Wis. 349, 189 N.W. 1028 (1922); Klemens v. Badger Mutual Insurance Company, 8 Wis.2d 565, 99 N.W.2d 865 (1959), and Shearer v. Dunn County Mut. Ins. Co., 39 Wis.2d 240, 159 N.W.2d 89 (1968). Hedtcke contended that the facts ......
-
Aquino v. United Prop. & Cas. Co.
...is joint, yet are often unclear as to how they arrive at this decision" [footnote omitted] ). See also Klemens v. Badger Mut. Ins. Co., 8 Wis. 2d 565, 567, 99 N.W.2d 865 (1959) ("What is material is the fact that the insurance was written in the joint names of Mr. and Mrs. Klemens and they ......
-
Maravich v. Aetna Life and Cas. Co.
...v. Domina, 137 Vt. 3, 399 A.2d 502 (1979); Rockingham v. Hummel, 219 Va. 803, 250 S.E.2d 774 (1979); Klemens v. Badger Mutual Insurance Co. of Milwaukee, 8 Wis.2d 565, 99 N.W.2d 865 (1959), overruled by, Hedtcke v. Sentry Insurance Co., supra. Where spouses have owned property by the entire......
-
St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Molloy
...the insured property. See Rockingham Mutual Ins. Co. v. Hummel, 219 Va. 803, 250 S.E. 774, 776 (1979); Klemens v. Badger Mutual Ins. Co., 8 Wis.2d 565, 99 N.W.2d 865, 866 (1959). Nor are we convinced that greater specificity, absent an explicit request, in explaining the nature of the negle......
-
13.3 Concealment and Fraud
...[a]rson has been held to be a fraudulent act, as any intentional destruction of the insured property. Klemens v. Badger Mut. Ins. Co., 8 Wis. 2d 565, 99 N.W.2d 865 (Wis. 1959). Where, as here, the title to the property is held jointly and that property insured under a single policy and is d......